What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on August 22, 2019 (6:24) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
How sharpness with tic 1.4x seems very good to me, as Af instead how it behaves in the subjects in flight is much faster than a7r3 with tlc?because a7r3 with tlc seems uncertain in subjects in flight little usable Come nitidezza con tic 1.4x mi sembra molto buona, come Af invece come si comporta nei soggetti in volo è molto più veloce di a7r3 con tlc?perché a7r3 con tlc sembra incerta nei soggetti in volo poco utilizzabile |
| sent on August 22, 2019 (6:40) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
The 200-600 with the TLC starts from F9, this makes the car go into CDAF (A7RIII). With contrasting af sensors, the machine is much slower, firstly because it doesn't know which way to move the lenses and then because the best contrast verification is slow in general.
The A6400 holds the PDAF at least up to F9, so it goes very fast. Il 200-600 con il TLC parte da F9, questo fa andare la macchina in CDAF (A7RIII). Con i sensori af a contrasto, la macchina è molto più lenta, prima di tutto perché non sa in che direzione spostare le lenti e poi perché la verifica del contrasto migliore è lenta in generale.
La A6400 regge il PDAF almeno fino a F9, quindi va velocissima. |
| sent on August 22, 2019 (15:21) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Practically with the 6400 you barely realize that you have the multiplier, at the level of detail in the subjects in flight you notice the difference?in practice it is better to croppe or use the tic? Praticamente con la a 6400 ci si accorge a malapena di avere il moltiplicatore, a livello di dettaglio nei soggetti in volo si nota la differenza?in pratica é meglio croppare o utilizzare il tic? |
| sent on August 22, 2019 (21:12) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
With the A6400 it's better the TLC great. You almost don't realize that you've mounted it, both because of the fast-paced af and the IQ that remains at great levels. Con la A6400 è meglio il TLC alla grande. Quasi non ti accorgi di averlo montato, sia per l'af che resta velocissimo e sia per l'IQ che resta ad ottimi livelli. |
| sent on August 22, 2019 (22:16) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thank you Pierino for the directions,it will be my next body to be flanked by 7r3. Moreover putting a zoom all-rounder, or a fixed, with little weight and footprint you bring a match that pulls out excellent rows ,for the naturalistic l instead I see bread and jam with the 200 600, which becomes 300 900 with tlc you get to the stratospheric focal 1260mm F9... So much stuff ... Grazie Pierino per le indicazioni,sarà il mio prossimo corpo da affiancare a 7r3. Oltretutto mettendo uno zoom tuttofare, o un fisso,con poco peso e ingombro ti porti una abbinata che tira fuori ottimi file ,per la naturalistica l invece lo vedo pane e marmellata con il 200 600, che diventa 300 900 con tlc si arriva alla stratosferica focale 1260mm F9...tanta roba ... |
| sent on August 23, 2019 (1:26) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Yes and not least, the cost is affordable. Eh sì e non ultimo, il costo è abbordabile. |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
![[retina]](shared_files/layout/retina_badge.jpg){kind=icon}
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
24.0 MEGAPIXEL
Resize to fit window
