What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
user147467 | sent on May 24, 2019 (14:39) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Nice shot..
Bello scatto..
|
| sent on May 24, 2019 (18:19) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I do not know the conditions in which you were, but being able even if freehand you had to exploit the wall as a support to seek a better parallelism, plus I would have opted saw the subject for a lower diaphragm certain that the resulting PDC would have been Enough for a good insect reading in favor of a faster time. Non so le condizioni in cui ti trovavi, ma potendo anche se a mano libera avresti dovuto sfruttare il muro come appoggio per cercare un miglior parallelismo, in più avrei optato visto il soggetto per un diaframma inferiore certo che la pdc risultante sarebbe stata sufficiente per una buona lettura dell'insetto a favore di un tempo più veloce. |
| sent on May 24, 2019 (18:30) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
“ I would have opted seeing the subject for a certain lower aperture that the resulting PDC would have been enough for a good insect reading in favor of a faster time. /QUOTE
Why would I use a faster time? „ " avrei optato visto il soggetto per un diaframma inferiore certo che la pdc risultante sarebbe stata sufficiente per una buona lettura dell'insetto a favore di un tempo più veloce. "
perchè avrei dovuto usare un tempo più veloce? |
| sent on May 25, 2019 (10:13) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
“ Why would I use a faster time? /QUOTE
saw the optics used would be more appropriate to operate in my opinion with a margin of safety to avoid a possible micro-blur 1/100 „ " perchè avrei dovuto usare un tempo più veloce? "
Visto l'ottica usata sarebbe più opportuno per operare a mio avviso con un margine di sicurezza per evitare un eventuale micromosso 1/100 |
| sent on May 25, 2019 (13:34) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
In fact the machine was resting firmly on the wall, so there was no danger of moving, so 1/60 evening adequate, also because it was active the VR.... In realtà la macchina era appoggiata saldamente al muro, per cui non c'era alcun pericolo di micromosso, per cui 1/60 sera adeguato, anche perchè era attivo il VR.... |
| sent on May 25, 2019 (18:03) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I had read about the bee, but I didn't know if there was a chance to use the wall as a tripod. :-) Avevo letto dell'ape , ma non sapevo se vi era la possibilità di utilizzare il muro come cavalletto.  |
| sent on May 25, 2019 (18:14) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Not to say, but anyway 1/60 is a time a little too slow to take pictures like that. It is true that the bee, as you write, was still but I do not understand why you used an F/16. In These photographs it is used practically always, except some special cases, the most open diaphragm or however a maximum diaphragm of f/8. This is because: first you "from" a shutter speed very fast, which combined to ISO adjusts a good time, then with these apertures you get the maximum sharpness of the lens unless it is a wide angle or lens for landscaping; Moreover, these diaphragms make sure that in the photo there is the foreground in focus while the background completely blurry.
is a tip for photos in the future, especially for those in freehand that otherwise, with inadequate shooting times, are micro-moves.
A greeting
Andrea Non per dire, ma comunque 1/60 è un tempo un po' troppo lento per fare fotografie del genere. E' vero che l'ape, come tu scrivi, era immobile ma non capisco percheè hai utilizzato un f/16. In queste fotografie si usa praticamente sempre, salvo alcuni casi particolari, il diaframma più aperto o comunque un diaframma massimo di f/8. Questo perchè: innanzitutto ti "da" un tempo di scatto molto veloce, che combinato a ISO adeguati da un'ottimo tempo, poi con questi diaframmi ottieni la massima nitidezza dell'obiettivo salvo non sia un grandangolo o un obiettivo per la paesaggistica; inoltre questi diaframmi fanno si che nella foto ci sia il soggettto in primo piano a fuoco mentre lo sfondo completamente sfuocato.
E' un consiglio che ti per le foto in future, soprattutto per quelle a manolibera che altrimenti, con tempi di scatto inadeguati, risultano micromosse.
Un saluto
Andrea |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
![[retina]](shared_files/layout/retina_badge.jpg){kind=icon}
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
6.3 MEGAPIXEL
Resize to fit window
