Untitled Photo | JuzaPhoto

JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.

OK, I confirm

You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept Cookies

Customize

Refuse Cookies

Galleries
Astrophotography

23.1 MEGAPIXEL

Resize to fit window

Paesaggi 1 View gallery (15 photos)

Untitled Photo sent on May 11, 2019 (22:09) by Mattia6679. 7 comments, 749 views.

, 10 sec f/2.0, ISO 2000, tripod.

View High Resolution 23.1 MP

13 persons like it: Dexter88, Elias Piccioni, Fabrizios53, Johnjz, Keyt, Locksley1979, Lucamontipo, Mauro Vincenzi, Mercury_Falling, Nemesi9191, Pippo65, Sangianfranco, Stefanog31

What do you think about this photo?

Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?

You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.

user73210

sent on March 21, 2020 (18:13) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Looks like someone's grilling behind Mt. :-D
Ovviously it was a joke. ... I think you've cleared too much of brush. Everything should be done in aquisition, the brush should not be used

Mattia6679

sent on March 21, 2020 (22:03) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

In acquisition there is already enough, I will have exaggerated. the next time I put my hand on this file I'll go there a little lighter, thanks to the advice ;-)

user73210

sent on March 21, 2020 (23:27) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

10 seconds to f2 is little stuff. You should significantly increase the time to increase the chance of capturing the signal. You'll see that after the brush you don't need

Mattia6679

sent on March 21, 2020 (23:39) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

The timing has been adjusted, according to the focal point, to avoid achieving the choppy effect of the stars.
In the absence of astro-pursuer how could I do?

user73210

sent on March 21, 2020 (23:50) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

You'd need at least one shorter target. Unfortunately there is no escape, the only solution is to add more shots. Test!

Locksley1979

sent on March 22, 2020 (11:32) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

To be a single shot the result is not bad at all. I would have detached the Milky Way a little more from the sky and emphasized the colors a little more. Of course, stacking gives other results...

Ricgallo98

sent on September 04, 2021 (2:16) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Have you made a vertical overview ?

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

Some comments may have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator.