What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on April 30, 2019 (15:24) | This comment has been translated
Very nice! |
| sent on April 30, 2019 (19:12) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thank you so much Michael Grazie Mille Michael |
| sent on May 05, 2019 (17:08) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
If you still face environments of this type I would recommend the use of a flash or an LED lamp. In my opinion for this kind of photo is a bit risky to use such a sensibility. Se affronterai ancora ambienti di questo tipo di consiglierei l'uso di un flash o una lampada led. A mio avviso per questo genere di foto è un po' azzardato utilizzare una simile sensibilità. |
| sent on September 24, 2019 (2:29) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Quoto Pigi47. The image is beautiful in normal vision. Very beautiful colors. There's too much digital noise and soft detail in HD viewing. Probably because of the 5000 ISO, but maybe also for crop or other passage in pp, in fact the camera those ISO should digest them quite well. Better lighting would allow you to reduce ISOs, use more closed diaphragm, needless to say then that a macro-specific lens would help you. Hello Sergio Quoto Pigi47. L'immagine è bella a visione normale. Molto belli i colori. Tuttavia è presente troppo rumore digitale e dettagli morbidi in visione in HD. Verosimilmente per colpa dei 5000 ISO, ma forse anche per crop o altro passaggio in pp, infatti la fotocamera quegli ISO dovrebbe digerirli abbastanza bene. Un'illuminazione migliore ti consentirebbe di ridurre gli ISO, usare diaframma più chiuso, inutile dire poi che un obiettivo specifico per macro ti aiuterebbe. Ciao Sergio |
| sent on September 24, 2019 (11:21) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Unfortunately it is a place where the easel is forbidden because it can get in the way of people and the flash disturbs butterflies... so aimé also banned that :-o Purtroppo è un luogo dove il cavalletto é proibito perché può intralciare le persone e il flash disturba le farfalle... quindi aimé vietato pure quello |
| sent on January 04, 2021 (20:58) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I really like it! As others have said, I'm sorry because there's a little bit of light missing, but that takes very little away from the beauty of the specimen. 8-) If I can afford it, did you do it at a butterfly house? A greeting Silvio Mi piace molto! Come hanno già detto altri, dispiace perchè manca un filino di luce, ma ciò toglie pochissimo alla bellezza dell'esemplare. Se posso permettermi, l'hai fatta ad una butterfly house? Un saluto Silvio |
| sent on January 09, 2021 (13:38) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Hi Silvio! Thane for the welcome comment however yes, it was made at the butterfly house in Bordano (UD). In the captions of the photos taken the same day I have already said it seems to me but I see that there is therefore no so I add it as info. Ciao Silvio! Grazie per il gradito commento comunque sì, è stata fatta alla casa della farfalla a Bordano (UD). Nelle didascalie delle foto fatte lo stesso giorno l'ho già detto mi pare ma vedo che qui non c'è quindi la aggiungo come info. |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |