RCE Foto

(i) On JuzaPhoto, please disable adblockers (let's see why!)






Login LogoutJoin JuzaPhoto!
JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.


OK, I confirm


You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept CookiesCustomizeRefuse Cookies



 
Port of Palinuro...

Palinuro

View gallery (51 photos)

Port of Palinuro sent on October 26, 2018 (23:15) by Vito1972. 3 comments, 110 views. [retina]

at 18mm, 5 sec f/22.0, ISO 100, tripod. Parco del Cilento e Vallo di Diano, Italy.




View High Resolution 17.0 MP  

2 persons like it: Giovabubi, Sassi


What do you think about this photo?


Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?


You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.




avatarmoderator
sent on October 27, 2018 (11:10) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Good the point of recovery and composition. Closing it at F. 22 led to a loss of yield (diffraction), if you searched for a silky sea it was preferable to opt for a dedicated ND filter but using a more open aperture value.
(IMHO)
Hello, Lauro

avatarjunior
sent on October 27, 2018 (14:56) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Thank you friend for the advice. I wanted to have depth of field and detail and I closed the diaphragm. I used a variable density ND filter to lower the light to several stops. Maybe I must have played poorly with the exposure triangle. I'm trying to grow in the photographic field and it's just the tips like yours that give me a hand. I appreciate that. Thank you!

avatarmoderator
sent on October 27, 2018 (16:08) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Abandon the variable nd filter and opt for 2 with fixed nd screw, you would have a better yield. For the diaphragm, depending on the optics, stop at F. 11 F. 13.
A tomorrow evaluates the mixed system filter Pola + F. A Lastra Lee-Haida
Hello, Lauro


RCE Foto

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

Some comments may have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator.  Microsoft Translator



 ^

JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.

Mobile Version - juza.ea@gmail.com - Terms of use and Privacy - Cookie Preferences - P. IVA 01501900334 - REA 167997- PEC juzaphoto@pec.it

May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me