What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on October 12, 2018 (14:58) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Decidedly beautiful
Congratulations
Claudio C decisamente bella
complimenti
claudio c |
| sent on October 12, 2018 (18:00)
Beautiful shot. Congratulations! Hello Amir. |
| sent on October 12, 2018 (19:59)
Nice light temperature and fine soft light. Lacking in shadows - blacks come up as dark grays on my (low quality) screen. |
user112477 | sent on October 13, 2018 (9:25) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I'll be out of the choir but to me this Xt3 shows even more of the XT2 the detail Mixed/confused. Then the strong colors
will be due to the Environment. Overall: Congratulations to the photographer not the Camera. Sarò fuori dal coro ma a me questa Xt3 mostra ancor più della XT2 il dettaglio impastato/confuso. Poi i colori forti
saranno dovuti all'ambiente. In complesso: complimenti al fotografo non alla fotocamera. |
| sent on October 13, 2018 (9:46) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Juza But how are you processing them?
I also know that they are very mixed. As you know I have the X-T3 from Day One and I notice the exact opposite in my photos. The ISO 160 is much cleaner and more detailed than Xtrans 3.
There is something I do not get back in your workflow, although I have to say that the lenses with which you are trying, apart from the 10-24, for my standards are quite scarce. Juza ma come le stai processando?
Noto anch'io che sono molto impastate. Come sai ho la X-T3 dal Day One e noto l'esatto contrario nelle mie foto. I 160 ISO sono molto più puliti e dettagliati dell'xtrans 3.
C'è qualcosa che non mi torna nel tuo workflow, anche se devo dire che le lenti con cui la stai provando, a parte il 10-24, per i miei standard sono piuttosto scarse. |
| sent on October 13, 2018 (11:21)
The lens should be no problem unless this is a 'bad apple'. What may influence is if the camera is left, or stuck, at "DR400". With xt1 and xt2 you could get this washed out look - if you left it on dr400 or on drAUTO.
On my screen, again, the file shows fine in small view (about 700 px vertical) but the full size file does not pass the test - it is on the soft side and very low contrast. Maybe but maybe only this is not camera jpeg, but something converted from the RAF with some alternative package (Adobe, etc.). (?)
I am also waiting for XT3 to test, but it has not arrived here yet. Maybe I get one in November.
Too bad my Internet connection will be off this week as I am very interested in this camera as my future option to work with.
Best regards, good light to all, bon week-end,
nico |
| sent on October 13, 2018 (12:52) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Mah, a little all at 100% have this Rendition. Not very far from my XT-2. With these sensors The jam is always around the corner :-( Mah, un po' tutte al 100% hanno questa resa. Non molto distante dalla mia XT-2. Con questi sensori la marmellata è sempre dietro l'angolo  |
| sent on October 13, 2018 (18:38) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
juza, are you using Lr or Capture One to work the files?
Juza, stai usando Lr o Capture One per lavorare i file?
|
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
![[retina]](shared_files/layout/retina_badge.jpg){kind=icon}
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
24.9 MEGAPIXEL
Resize to fit window
