What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on August 06, 2018 (15:04) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Hello Andrea the image is beautiful, also excellent dynamism, pity however for the bird in the top right, in my opinion distracts the scene, I would have cloned so as not to take the look away from the bride and groom Ciao Andrea L'immagine è bella,ottimo anche il dinamismo,peccato però per il volatile in alto a dx,secondo me distrae la scena,lo avrei clonato in modo da non far distogliere lo sguardo dagli sposi |
| sent on August 06, 2018 (15:05) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I don't deny that I thought about it... then I left everything as it is.... but probably without it was better thanks Non ti nego che ci ho pensato... poi ho lasciato tutto com'è.... però probabilmente senza era meglio grazie |
| sent on August 06, 2018 (15:06) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Imagine, I dropped my eye and I felt to advise you ;-) Figurati, mi ci è caduto l occhio e mi sono sentito di consigliarti  |
| sent on August 10, 2018 (22:13) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I agree with Alessio, without prejudice to the beautiful moment. May I ask why f 5.6? For the distance to which you were also a F 3.5 if you did not feel the 2.8 ti there was like PDF for you to focus on the subjects. Perhaps you did not want to accentuate the bokeh too much or because it is too soft?.... rectific... I didn't read you duplicated. Concordo con Alessio, fermo restando il bellissimo momento. Posso chiederti perché f 5.6? Per la distanza a cui eri anche un f 3.5 se non te la sentivi il 2.8 ti ci stava come pdf per aver a fuoco i soggetti. Forse non volevi accentuare troppo il bokeh oppure perché a TA é troppo morbido?....rettifico...Non avevo letto che avevi duplicato. |
| sent on August 10, 2018 (22:35) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
@Lore80 did you not read the shutter data well? Especially the notes ;-) maybe have a 400 2.8, pity that in a wedding certain lenses you can not bring them behind, the versatility here counts much more.. A TC X2 with its little weight instead cmq worth and is so much stuff.... ;-) @Lore80 non hai letto bene i dati di scatto? soprattutto le note ;-) magari avere un 400 2.8, peccato che in un matrimonio certe lenti non te le puoi portare dietro, la versatilità qui conta molto di più.. un TC X2 con il suo poco peso invece cmq vale la pena ed è tanta roba.... ;-) |
| sent on August 10, 2018 (23:12) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Yes Yes blade, I read later, sorry. I understand very well, I recently tasted what it means to carry the beasts... in the specific Nikkor 200mm F2. Nice moment and beautiful shot Si si blade, ho letto dopo, scusami. Comprendo benissimo, ho assaggiato da poco cosa vuol dire portarsi dietro delle belve...nello specifico nikkor 200mm f2. Bel momento e bello scatto |
| sent on August 10, 2018 (23:20) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Here Bravo you have centered the thing, cmq thanks x the compliments... Ecco bravo hai centrato la cosa, cmq grazie x i complimenti... |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
![[retina]](shared_files/layout/retina_badge.jpg){kind=icon}
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
3.8 MEGAPIXEL
Resize to fit window
