What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on January 11, 2018 (17:08) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Beautiful moment, it was possible to move the PDR so you can frame out the person behind and the boat would have been a composition image cleaner, however I like it. Congratulations, hello. Bel momento, fosse stato possibile spostare il pdr in modo da poter inquadrare lasciando fuori la persona di schiena e la barca ne sarebbe risultata un'immagine compositivamente più pulita, comunque mi piace. Complimenti, ciao. |
| sent on January 11, 2018 (17:24) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I share what was written by the great Catherine congratulations, I like it very much
claudio c condivido quanto scritto dalla grande Caterina complimenti , mi piace molto claudio c |
| sent on January 11, 2018 (19:07) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
beautiful, Cuba true stupenda, Cuba verace |
| sent on January 11, 2018 (21:31) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Beautiful I really like ... a small technical question to anyone who wants to answer ... if the machine had been set with a more closed focal length 6.3 or more and the time set to 1/400 would not have had the same atmosphere but with a detail better because of a larger PDC ?? Congratulations for the photo, hello Giuseppe. Bella mi piace molto... una piccola domanda tecnica a chiunque voglia rispondere... se la macchina fosse stata impostata con focale più chiusa tipo 6.3 o più e i tempi impostati ad 1/400 non si avrebbe avuto la stessa atmosfera ma con un dettaglio migliore per via di una PDC maggiore?? Complimenti per la foto, ciao Giuseppe. |
| sent on January 12, 2018 (1:29) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Hello! thanks for the comments! reluctantly I kept the image as it was in the original because the fact of cutting away the person back would have left the fisherman cut in half (if you notice the right foot is hidden ...). as for the question of Joseph, I honestly can not make projections about how the photo would come with an aperture of 6.3, someone dared? :-D Ciao! grazie dei commenti! a malincuore ho mantenuto l'immagine come era in originale perché il fatto di tagliare via la persona di schiena avrebbe lasciato il pescatore tagliato a metà (se notate il piede dx è nascosto...). per quanto riguarda la domanda di Giuseppe, sinceramente non riesco a fare proiezioni su come sarebbe venuta la foto con un'apertura di 6.3, qualcuno azzarda? |
| sent on January 12, 2018 (7:56) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Hello Matthew, it is not to break the boxes but only for the desire to learn and just a confrontation to understand ... as I wrote the photo I like .. as regards the PDR maybe you would have come a half step back easier to bring the subject back again !! Ciao Matteo, non è per rompere le scatole ma solo per la voglia di imparare e solo un confronto per capire... come ho sopra scritto la foto mi piace.. per quanto riguarda il PDR forse ti sarebbe venuto più facile un mezza passo indietro per far rientrare tutto anche il soggetto di spalle!! |
| sent on January 12, 2018 (10:34) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Probably yes, but I remember the situation well and behind I had a boy of 12 years with a crab just stuck in the harpoon and next to the sea :-D Thanks for the advice and the questions, I am also curious to know what would have changed if I had put other combinations;) Probabilmente si, ma ricordo bene la situazione e dietro avevo un ragazzo di 12 anni con un granchio appena infilzato nella fiocina e di fianco il mare Grazie per i consigli e le domande, anche io sono curioso di sapere cosa sarebbe cambiato se avessi messo altre combinazioni ;) |
| sent on January 12, 2018 (16:54) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Great and wise use of the camera, careful composition, I like the point of recovery, beautiful colors, I join the well-deserved congratulations already received. Grande e sapiente uso della fotocamera, composizione curata, a me il punto di ripresa piace molto, splendidi i colori, mi associo ai complimenti meritatissimi già ricevuti. |
| sent on January 12, 2018 (22:26) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thank you so much for the nice words Publisher :-) Grazie mille delle belle parole Editore |
| sent on January 13, 2018 (10:07) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
“ I am also curious to know what would have changed if I had put other combinations;) „ In my opinion here the open diaphragm is the right choice, the guys and the network should be isolated as much as possible from the background even if with a wide-angle focal length sensor 17x13 the break is not very much. Hello. " anche io sono curioso di sapere cosa sarebbe cambiato se avessi messo altre combinazioni ;) " Secondo me qui il diaframma aperto è scelta giusta, i ragazzi e la rete andrebbero isolati il più possibile dallo sfondo anche se con una focale grandangolare su sensore 17x13 lo stacco non è comunque moltissimo. Ciao. |
| sent on January 13, 2018 (11:07) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
great shot a nice moment stopped good light and color I agree with Catherine for the choice of the diaphragm and the cut ...... :-) :-)
Hi Jerry ottimo scatto un bel momento fermato ottima luce e colore concordo con Caterina per la scelta del diaframma ed il taglio...... ciao Jerry |
| sent on January 13, 2018 (12:18) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thanks Catherine of the exhaustive answer, I should have some shots of other subjects done with the diaphragm more closed, but in the same place ... the atmosphere was perfect because at sunset we get confused better among the local people who do not care so much to the only two tourists in the area ... as soon as I settle maybe I load one or two :-)
Thanks Jerry for being over, see you soon! :-D
Grazie Caterina della esauriente risposta, dovrei avere qualche scatto di altri soggetti fatto con il diaframma più chiuso, ma nello stesso posto... l'atmosfera era perfetta perché al tramonto ci si confonde meglio tra la gente locale che non bada così tanto agli unici due turisti in zona... appena le sistemo magari ne carico una o due Grazie Jerry di essere passato, a presto! |
| sent on January 13, 2018 (12:27) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Caterina I thank you too for the answer. Caterina ti ringrazio anche io per la risposta. |
| sent on January 29, 2018 (11:52) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I do not know if Giuseppe Bertino will read this message, but I just right loaded a shot in the same place, done a few minutes before, with the diaphragm at f9 and times 1/125, you find it in my gallery of Cuba :-) Non so se Giuseppe Bertino leggerà questo messaggio, ma ho giusto giusto caricato uno scatto nello stesso posto, fatto pochi minuti prima, con il diaframma a f9 e tempi 1/125, lo trovi nella mia galleria di Cuba |
| sent on January 29, 2018 (12:48) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Read Matthew .. as soon as I'm in front of the PC I look at it from the phone for sure is not the same thing! Thank you Letto Matteo.. non appena sono di fronte al PC la guardo di sicuro dal cellulare non è la stessa cosa! Grazie |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |