What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on October 27, 2017 (21:33) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Very beautiful. Congrats!
A greeting Agata Molto bella, complimenti!
Un saluto Agata |
| sent on October 28, 2017 (16:22) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Hello! beautiful photos of my town's long lane! Ciao! bellissima foto dei lungarni della mia città! |
| sent on October 28, 2017 (22:09) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
great light and then Pisa is Pisa ;-)
good evening
Matthew gran bella luce e poi Pisa è Pisa
buona serata
Matteo |
| sent on October 29, 2017 (13:32) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
thank you very much for all 3!
in fact the light was very beautiful, just like the reflections in the Arno which then are the thing that pushed me to shoot, the river seemed to be on fire! grazie mille a tutti e 3!
in effetti la luce era molto bella, così come i riflessi nell'Arno che poi sono la cosa che mi ha spinto a scattare, il fiume sembrava andare a fuoco! |
| sent on January 12, 2018 (12:02) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
did you do some tweaking? because looking at it in high resolution the sky seems printed on cotton paper, as if there was a strange digital noise that at 160 iso seems strange to me. The 200d as you know I'm very interested but if already in base is suffering from noise .... hai fatto qualche ritocco? perchè guardandola in alta risoluzione il cielo sembra stampato su carta cotone, come se ci fosse uno strano rumore digitale che a 160 iso mi pare strano. La 200d come sai mi interessa molto ma se già ad iso base soffre di rumore.... |
| sent on January 12, 2018 (12:30) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
but surely I have retouched it, I do not remember what ... maybe sharpness and saturation a hair.
it's not that touch too much ever.
sure that if you look at 100% see the pixel hahaha but that even just out of the car ... I do not think it is so much noise but as real pixels .... I have noticed in other photos, there are many but they are seen anyway.
just that honestly, the photo looks at the inside, not 100% imho.
only the fixed ones do :-D (without controversy eh)
if you do not have to print in large size and do particular things, the photo in full screen is always clean, almost even at 6400 iso, if you do a bit of denoise. ma si sicuramente l'ho ritoccata, non ricordo cosa... forse nitidezza e saturazione un pelo.
non è che ritocco mai troppo.
certo che se la guardi al 100% vedi i pixel hahaha ma quello anche appena uscita dalla macchina... non credo sia tanto il rumore ma quanto pixel veri e propri.... io l'ho notato in altre foto, sono tantissimi ma si vedono comunque.
solo che onestamente, la foto si guarda a schermo interno, non al 100% imho.
solo i fissati lo fanno  (senza vena polemica eh)
se non devi stampare in grandi dimensioni e fare cose particolari, la foto a tutto schermo è sempre pulita, quasi anche a 6400 iso, se fai un po di denoise. |
| sent on January 12, 2018 (12:42) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I clicked on "high resolution" and showed me the picture as it would appear full-frame. Some 50x70 print I do and so far I have not had problems with the compact camera from 16 mega to 100 iso, so I was scared seeing your photo at full resolution at 160 ISO. ho cliccato su "alta risoluzione" e mi ha mostrato la foto come apparirebbe a pieno formato. Qualche stampa 50x70 la faccio e finora non ho avuto problemi con la compattina da 16 mega a 100 iso, per questo mi ero spaventato vedendo la tua foto a piena risoluzione a 160 iso. |
| sent on January 12, 2018 (13:00) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I do not know ... if I remember I send you the original file ... but I noticed that (in other files) at 100% the pixels are seen. I think just because they are 24 megapixels that are so many !!!
correct me someone if I'm wrong :-D
in the sense, which is a dense sensor and then enlarged you will never see an effect, as it were, organic as you see in the picture in full screen, but you will always see the pixels.
but also the press, I believe that you do not see it from a cm, but from 40-50 cm, then as nu impressionist painting, the effect "brushstroke" is canceled, and you see the contours of the beautiful objects precise. non so...se mi ricordo ti mando il file originale...ma ho notato che (in altri file) al 100% i pixel si vedono. credo proprio perchè siano i 24 megapixel che sono tanti!!!
mi corregga qualcuno se sbaglio
nel senso, che è un sensore denso e quindi ingrandito non vedrai mai un effetto, come dire, organico come vedi nella foto a tutto schermo, ma vedrai sempre e comunque i pixel.
ma anche la stampa, io credo che non la vedi da un cm, bensi da 40-50 cm, quindi come in un quadro impressionista, l'effetto "pennellata" si annulla, e vedi i contorni degli oggetti belli precisi. |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
![[retina]](shared_files/layout/retina_badge.jpg){kind=icon}
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
22.2 MEGAPIXEL
Resize to fit window
