What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on October 26, 2017 (19:17) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
but is the correct version of 35 1.8? or were you wrong? ma è la versione corretta di 35 1.8? o ti sei sbagliato? |
| sent on October 26, 2017 (19:22) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Yes you are the paid DX used 100 euros with hood .... for me an optics to have on FF ... seen the cost and the yield .... look that stuff without correcting the vignetting; -) ... and blurred it? for me nikon when i designed it wrong ahahahahah Si si è il DX pagato usato 100 euro con paraluce.... per me un ottica da avere su FF... visto il costo e la resa.... guarda che roba senza correggere la vignettatura ;-)... e lo sfocato? per me nikon quando l'ha progettata si è sbagliata ahahahahah |
| sent on October 26, 2017 (19:31) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I also had it on DX, but it does not make me crazy this 1600 ISO if it's flash is too pasty ... obviously 100% print is perfect!
ps but on FX you croppa? what do you do? the D5 gets in 1.5x si l'avevo anche io ,su DX però , non mi fa particolarmente impazzire questa resa a 1600 ISO se è con flash c'è troppo pastume ... ovviamente giudizio al100% stampata è perfetta!!!
p.s ma su FX ti croppa? che ti fa? la D5 si mette in 1,5x |
| sent on October 26, 2017 (21:06) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
on ff works in fx unless you tell him to work in dx if optical mounts dx, and very flash ... i have to calibrate it and in af-c it probably is not constant and i was in af-c, i shot at 1.8 better as sharpness , but I liked it ... cmq I took it to get specific photos that I will soon post
;-) su ff funziona in fx salvo non gli dici tu di lavorare in dx se monti ottiche dx, e nessunissimo flash... devo tararlo e in af-c probabilmente non é costante e stavo in af-c, ho scatti a 1.8 migliori come nitidezza, ma questo mi piaceva... cmq l'ho preso per farci specificamente delle foto che presto posterò
;-) |
| sent on October 26, 2017 (21:46) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Hi Lametta, I see that blonde takes you by the throat. ..... gourmet.
Salutons and compliments
Mat Ciao Lametta, vedo che la biondina ti prende per la gola. ..... buongustaio.
Salutoni e complimenti
Mat |
| sent on October 26, 2017 (22:40) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Blade always on the piece !! the great lighting frightened me I thought there was a flash spot somewhere, here I found the hair in the egg waiting for the next !!! Blade sempre sul pezzo!! la gran illuminazione mi ha fregato pensavo ci fosse un flash spot da qualche parte , qua ho proprio trovato il pelo nell'uovo attendo le prossime!!! |
| sent on October 26, 2017 (23:27) | This comment has been translated
;-) |
| sent on October 28, 2017 (9:45) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Handled light very well, beautiful composition.
I also tried the 35 DX 1.8 of a friend on my FF and used in FX mode without crop, there is vignetting, but much less than I thought, usable. Luce gestita molto bene, bella la composizione.
Ho provato anch'io il 35 1,8 DX di un amico sulla mia FF ed usata in modalità FX senza crop, c'è vignettatura, ma molto meno di quanto pensassi, utilizzabilissima. |
| sent on October 28, 2017 (11:15) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
but on FX keeps a pure 35? ma su FX mantiene un 35 puro? |
| sent on October 28, 2017 (11:19) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
If you select FX mode in the car, do not crochet in DX and keep the field angle of 35 mm, you notice vignetting at corners, but not black corners. Se selezioni la modalità FX in macchina, non croppa in DX e mantiene l'angolo di campo di un 35 mm, si nota vignettatura agli angoli, ma non angoli neri. |
| sent on October 28, 2017 (11:36) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
If you look at this shot I have slightly cropped it, but the vignette you see on the left is that of the optic I did not correct it ;-) cmq you 1.8 / 2 knocks, but as I said I'll use it for fine things so it goes well, on FF it's a bit like a helios, you can not have it for 100 euros .... then it's lightweightooooooo Se guardi questo scatto l'ho leggermente croppato, ma la vignettatura che vedi a sinistra è quella dell'ottica non l'ho corretta ;-) cmq si a 1.8 / 2 impasta, ma come ho detto lo userò per cose ben precise quindi va bene, su FF è un pò come un helios, non si può non avere per 100 euro.... poi è leggeroooooooo |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
![[retina]](shared_files/layout/retina_badge.jpg){kind=icon}
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
16.6 MEGAPIXEL
Resize to fit window
