What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
user28347 | sent on August 16, 2017 (11:53) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Beautiful really, try to take off the noise, I do not know how ;-) bella davvero ,proverei a togliere il rumore ,non so come |
| sent on August 16, 2017 (12:02) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thanks Sapf of the passage and the good comment.
Already taken off with the Dark ... and I too "nunchang" :-D
Thanks, of course, for appreciation
A greeting, G. Piero Grazie Sapf del passaggio e del bel commento.
Già tolto coi Dark... e pure io "di più nninzò"
Grazie naturalmente dell'apprezzamento
Un saluto, G.Piero |
| sent on August 16, 2017 (12:23) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Finally .... a photo at M31 with a 300!
I had the idea that this focal length was particularly good on APSc sensors.
As soon as I have time, will and chance I will also try this shot with a 300.
Meanwhile my compliments ... to be a single shot is really well done.
In my opinion, going beyond and eliminating noise, in addition to darkness, it would be necessary to integrate multiple frames to have more light signals .... this would also allow you to blur out the beautiful colors of this object ... who knows more than me me Correct if I'm wrong. Finalemente....una foto ad M31 con un 300!
Avevo idea che questa lunghezza focale le fosse particolarmente congeniale su sensori APSc.
Non appena avrò tempo, voglia e possibilità proverò anche io questo scatto con un 300.
Intanto i miei complimenti...per essere un singolo scatto è veramente ben fatto.
Secondo me per andare oltre ed eliminare rumore, oltre ai dark, occorrerebbe integrare più fotogrammi per avere più segnale luminoso....ciò ti permetterebbe anche di far saltare fuori i bellissimi colori di questo oggetto...chi ne sa più di me mi corregga se sbaglio. |
user44198 | sent on August 16, 2017 (14:42) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I bet you used DSS for stacking: - / missing color information scommetto che hai usato DSS per lo stacking manca l'informazione colore |
| sent on August 16, 2017 (17:07) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
|
| sent on August 16, 2017 (17:44) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
As a chronicle I add a datum on the Avisitude of the site from where I resumed Andromeda: well 42m slm :-D
But maybe not too significant for the result (?)
G.Piero A titolo di cronaca aggiungo un dato sull'Altitudine del sito da dove ho ripreso Andromeda: ben 42m s.l.m.
Ma forse non è troppo significativo per il risultato(?)
G.Piero |
user28347 | sent on August 16, 2017 (17:47) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
The height does not center anything, it is worth 1000 times the dark pesto l'altezza non centra niente ,vale 1000 volte di più il buio pesto |
| sent on August 16, 2017 (17:56) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Maybe something has something to do with the height, at 2000 meters the atmosphere has less polluting dust, generally it is drier and cleaner, much more than 42 meters ;-) In addition to much less light pollution Forse qualcosa c'entra anche l'altezza, a 2000 metri l'atmosfera ha meno pulviscolo inquinante, generalmente è più secca e pulita, molto più che a 42 metri Oltre che molto meno inquinamento luminoso |
user44198 | sent on August 16, 2017 (18:11) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Unfortunately it is to be dictated to 90% to DSS which gives you a quasi-monochrome autosave and it's hard to enter the color information !!! But then apologize G.Pietro, how many frames have you added? Did not mention it in the caption !! purtroppo è da imputare al 90% a DSS che ti restituisce un autosave quasi monocromatico e si fa fatica ad inserire le informazioni colore!!! ma poi scusa G.Pietro,quanti fotogrammi hai sommato?in didascalia non lo hai menzionato!! |
user44198 | sent on August 16, 2017 (18:11) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Unfortunately it is to be dictated to 90% to DSS which gives you a quasi-monochrome autosave and it's hard to enter the color information !!! But then apologize G.Pietro, how many frames have you added? Did not mention it in the caption !! purtroppo è da imputare al 90% a DSS che ti restituisce un autosave quasi monocromatico e si fa fatica ad inserire le informazioni colore!!! ma poi scusa G.Pietro,quanti fotogrammi hai sommato?in didascalia non lo hai menzionato!! |
| sent on August 16, 2017 (18:28) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
17 frames 7Dark and 5 Flat almost no crop, except that (about 3 mm) marginal, mandatory, resulting from the DSS alignment
(Ps the program you use is payable, about 250 Euros if I'm not ... but is an annual "tax", or is it yours definitely purchased?) 17 fotogrammi 7Dark e 5 Flat quasi niente crop, se non quello (circa 3 mm) marginale, obbligatorio, risultante dall'allineamento DSS
(Ps il programma che usi tu è a pagamento, circa 250 Euro se non erro... ma è una "tassa" annuale, o una volta acquistato è tuo definitivamente? ) |
user44198 | sent on August 16, 2017 (18:55) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Once and for life ... ;-) with all updates and new versions included una volta e per la vita... con tutti gli aggiornamenti e nuove versioni incluse |
| sent on August 16, 2017 (19:12) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Ok, Vega, thank you for the info :-)
Maybe I will make a thought,
Hello, G.Piero Ok, Vega, grazie della info
magari ci farò un pensiero,
ciao, G.Piero |
| sent on August 17, 2017 (7:10) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Just a thought ;-) ... and for completeness I add that the progr. Pixinsight assumes that deepsky photos ... are not only performed with telescopes (too restrictive), but above all (though small in diameter), with a good telescope (+ accessories) with good aperture (better if fluorescent) ... Well The telescope (a Polarex Unitron 102 Compact) I had for about 30 years ... I just sold it. In its place I took a Nexus 18-30x70 fluorite binoculars, much less challenging and especially relaxing, I would say "contemplative" :-D ;-). Ergo, my very few "Astronomical" photos will not claim .. and with DSS just a bit of ... "patience" ;-)
Good light :-) G.Piero Solo un pensiero appunto... e per completezza aggiungo che il progr. Pixinsight presume che le foto deepsky... non siano eseguite solo coi teleobbiettivi (troppo limitanti), ma soprattutto (anche se di piccolo diametro), con un buon telescopio (+ accessori) con buona apertura (meglio se fluorite)... Beh il telescopio (un Polarex Unitron 102 Compact) l'ho avuto per circa 30 anni... L'ho appena venduto. Al suo posto ho preso un Binocolo Nexus fluorite 18-30x70, molto meno impegnativo e soprattutto rilassante, direi "contemplativo". Ergo, le mie pochissime foto "Astronomiche" nulla pretenderanno.. e con DSS solo un po' di... "pazienza"
Buona luce G.Piero |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
![[retina]](shared_files/layout/retina_badge.jpg){kind=icon}
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
3.8 MEGAPIXEL
Resize to fit window
