Ops ... the shoe | JuzaPhoto

JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.

OK, I confirm

You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept Cookies

Customize

Refuse Cookies

Galleries
Wedding

3.8 MEGAPIXEL

Resize to fit window

Wedding Black/White & Color View gallery (24 photos)

Ops ... the shoe sent on July 06, 2017 (10:38) by Blade_71. 24 comments, 677 views.

at 80mm, 1/1000 f/4.0, ISO 100, hand held.

View High Resolution 3.8 MP

19 persons like it: Agata Arezzo, Bogdan, Bptanc, Gaia Rampon, Giorgio49, GiulianoStev, Gobbo, Ilmagomaghetto, Imagomak, Luis Bejarano, Madmax72, Magda69, MatthewX, Mauriziol, Mauropol, NaCapaTanta, Politiz29, Ticktick, Zaimon

PAGE: ALL PAGES | NEXT PAGE »

What do you think about this photo?

Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?

You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.

user1036

sent on July 06, 2017 (16:33) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Congratulations on the handling of the lights but above all of the pose, natural with a penetrating look. Gorgeous!!!

user1036

sent on July 06, 2017 (16:34) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

.... the only strange thing is that it was taken with a Nikon! :-D :-D :-D :-D :-D

Blade_71

sent on July 06, 2017 (16:47) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Ahahaah glow .... ps high lights? I have a D5 what is the problem? If I had a canon maybe I would have had a problem, I did not even use a light so bright for .... ;-)

user1036

sent on July 06, 2017 (16:56) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

... ah I forgot you were Nikon employee :-D
Beautiful photo ... nice also the fountain, indeed er fountain! ;-)
Good light

PS
... since when in Canon here we have problems with high lights ???? We expose to dx .... which for us means overexposure 8-) ergo

Blade_71

sent on July 06, 2017 (17:07) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

When you realize that exposing to the right is always related to the scene and it is not the panacea for everything it will be too late ahahaha if i have high lights to preserve in a scene with a great range, how far will i be able to push it right? 11:00 am beautiful light? .... the beautiful light one has to find it, at all times there is a beautiful light, just know what to do ... and no flash or panels ;-) Good Light

user119620

sent on July 06, 2017 (17:20) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Illuminating conversation! Superb picture ... every bride would like to have it! :-)

Blade_71

sent on July 06, 2017 (17:35) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Thanks Gaia .... since we are in the topic 11:10 ... now that no one would tell you that there is a light dance, however meanwhile ... without the use of anything x lighten ;-)
[URL =] www.juzaphoto.com/galleria.php?t=2384647&l=it

Ilmagomaghetto

sent on July 06, 2017 (20:06) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Beautiful photo beautiful bride and beautiful black and white.

Compliments

Ste'83

sent on July 06, 2017 (22:04) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Fantastic Andrea ... no words! Beautifully the white you got, and not least the pose and the dress of the bride!
... this means that you were already ready to frame the bride "in (almost) every movement!

A greeting Stefano.

user1036

sent on July 06, 2017 (22:22) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

"And do not use flash or panels" C
Aro Blade, it serves what you can use and realize the photo you have in mind.

user1036

sent on July 06, 2017 (22:24) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Exposing to dx, I know I have to go in the street before I understand, but this photo illuminates me immensely and clears the ideas ... even without the use of flash ... scherzo blade

Blade_71

sent on July 07, 2017 (10:54) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Thanks to everyone .... the exposure to the right is not difficult, you just have to know your sensor well to the various iso and understand when you can apply it ... but if you want to preserve a sky rather than talk about exposure to DX I would say to expose to the limit of sky clipping, then recover lights and shots on the shadows, but this does not coincide with an exposure to the right, you will see that the photo often continues to be under undiscovered histogram .... ;-)

user1036

sent on July 07, 2017 (11:24) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Of course, also because there is much more information, in terms of bits, in an over-exposed (non-burnt) image, than in an undefined image. The term espx to dx is a much wider conciliation simplification, which goes through the knowledge of its capture and development tools. Maybe some photo I know too ;-)

Blade_71

sent on July 07, 2017 (11:41) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Obviously there is more information about how you said you did not burn, but you will see that every time you are in the presence of M light and therefore a wide range to expose a photo properly and not burn the cmq lights You're never right ;-)

Does this look like a right exposure? If I had further overexposed the dress became unrecoverable at that point I would not have had more information in the photo but less, the dress was burned ...

user1036

sent on July 07, 2017 (13:30) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

It is a very broad range without peaks, however it tends to dx. Then to overcome these things comes out the strobist in me who controls the light instead of being commanded.

user1036

sent on July 07, 2017 (13:31) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Anyway this is nice

NaCapaTanta

sent on July 07, 2017 (13:40) | This comment has been translated

Excellent catch!

Blade_71

sent on July 07, 2017 (13:45) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Dynamic photo flash has two limits, someone needs someone close to the subject that keeps it often, so it needs another person and this is not always possible for a thousand reasons, and you lose time in a job that often does not have time, I was 120 Mm 1/1000 f / 4.0, with that light if I used a flash on the machine it was supposed to be a x can lighten ahahah if you have the flash time ok! Otherwise it is best to avoid it ...

Giorgio49

sent on July 07, 2017 (13:58) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Yes, that's all ... but the D5 allows too much ..!
Those who do not know us do not know .... They're really beautiful, Blade compliments.

Blade_71

sent on July 07, 2017 (14:01) | This comment has been translated

Thanks Giorgio

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

PAGE: ALL PAGES | NEXT PAGE »

Some comments may have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator.