JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here
Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
sent on June 25, 2017 (21:20) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I'm a little afraid of people with clear eyes: -or However, the forehead can also be cut in post, the arm is not because it is so in the original picture, I do not know if I was wrong or her: -D (I know more, I was pointing to my face). Anyway, to make the perfect picture with regard to the framing I would say it can be cut to the neck height. At most I have another one made more far:
A me fanno un po' paura le persone con gli occhi chiari Comunque la fronte si può tagliare anche in post, il braccio no perché è così nella foto originale, non so se ero io storto o lei (mi sa più io! Puntavo al viso. Le prossime volte dovrò fare più attenzione.). In ogni caso per rendere la foto perfetta per quanto riguarda l'inquadratura direi che si può tagliare all'altezza del collo. Al massimo ne ho un altra fatta più da lontano:
sent on June 25, 2017 (21:36) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
But let me know a curiosity: a lens like the 50mm ox would not be more suitable to the kind of shots you do? Ma toglimi una curiosità: una lente tipo il 50mm oss non sarebbe più adatta al tipo di scatti che fai?
sent on June 25, 2017 (21:48) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Maybe for this photo in particular and this kind where a person poses for me yes. But for all the others (most of them) no, because I'm too tight, I almost always get a bit of bust if it's okay or because I have little space or because I have little time to do the photo or why People around and for various reasons I prefer to approach rather than move away. My goal is to take the person (or rather what I wear) to the full figure and if I need a detail I come close to it. Then I obviously use the 35mm because it is the focal point used by Bill Cunningham :-). I also have the 50mm I tried to use but it's too long. Magari per questa foto in particolare e questo genere dove una persona posa per me sì. Però per tutte le altre (che sono la maggior parte) no perché sono troppo stretto, quasi sempre riuscirei a prendere un mezzo busto se va bene o perché ho poco spazio oppure perché ho poco tempo per fare la foto, oppure ancora perché c'è gente attorno e per vari motivi preferisco avvicinarmi piuttosto che allontanarmi. Il mio obbiettivo è prendere le persona (o meglio ciò che indossano) a figura intera e se mi serve un dettaglio mi avvicino. Poi ovviamente uso il 35mm perché è la focale che usava Bill Cunningham . Ho anche il 50mm che ho provato ad usare ma appunto è troppo lungo.
![[retina]](shared_files/layout/retina_badge.jpg){kind=icon}
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
16.9 MEGAPIXEL
Resize to fit window
. Ho anche il 50mm che ho provato ad usare ma appunto è troppo lungo.