What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on June 02, 2017 (18:20) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Great shot, compliments !!!
A greeting, Alexander Splendido scatto, complimenti!!!
Un saluto, Alessandro |
| sent on June 05, 2017 (0:15) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
... I appreciate on several occasions the idea of ??taking a counter: sometimes it can give you nice outcomes ;-)
Thanks Alessandro! ... sto apprezzando in varie occasioni l'idea di scattare controsole: talvolta può dare esiti gradevoli 
Grazie alessandro! |
| sent on January 19, 2019 (3:18) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Also the details of this 18-105 however didn't seem bad. Nice shots. Anche i dettagli di questo 18-105 però non mi sembrano male. Begli scatti. |
| sent on January 20, 2019 (13:21) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thanks Claudio!
about the lens I don't have many terms of comparison, but having made a thorough comparison with the much more expensive and praised 16-80 2.8/4 (compared to which I found no noticeable differences), my impression is that the modest 18-105 does its job Decently enough, and you don't have to Fain to have fun around.
Grazie Claudio!
Riguardo all'obiettivo non ho molti termini di paragone, ma avendo fatto un confronto approfondito con il ben più costoso e lodato 16-80 2.8/4 (rispetto al quale non ho trovato differenze avvertibili), la mia impressione è che il modesto 18-105 faccia il suo lavoro abbastanza dignitosamente, e non occorra svenarsi per divertirsi in giro.
|
| sent on January 20, 2019 (16:32) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
With this story of the goals you seem absurd, I get super-sharp shots from the 28-300 VR that I carry almost always (both on Fx and Dx). Of course the superzooms have limits, but many of these limits belong to legends of the past and when the machines could not manage them and when firmwares and softwares did not correct the optical aberrations automatically, or with a click.
with a car of years ago, too noisy already at 1600 and without self-correction of fringing, vignetting etc, it is clear that the superzoom was mediocre. Now things are very, very changed. Idem for post-production: Now the Raw converter (and also photoshop in the lens correction) have the machine-lens modules, optimize everything. Con questa storia degli obiettivi ci si fanno pare assurde, io ottengo scatti super-sharp dal 28-300 VR che mi porto quasi sempre appresso (sia su Fx che su Dx). Certo che i superzoom hanno limiti, ma molti di questi limiti appartengono a leggende del passato e a quando le macchine non potevano gestirli e quando firmwares e softwares non correggevano le aberrazioni ottiche automaticamente, o con un click.
Con una macchina di anni fa, troppo rumorosa già a 1600 e senza autocorrezione di fringing, vignetting ecc, è chiaro che il superzoom fosse mediocre. Adesso le cose sono molto, molto cambiate. Idem per la postproduzione : adesso i Raw converter (e anche photoshop nella correzione lente) hanno i moduli macchina-lente, ottimizzano tutto. |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
![[retina]](shared_files/layout/retina_badge.jpg){kind=icon}
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
22.3 MEGAPIXEL
Resize to fit window
