What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
user7819 | sent on September 14, 2012 (8:16) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
very nice molto bella |
| sent on September 14, 2012 (9:13) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Good shooting maybe a little too much noise and focus on the eye but probably not in the body, however excellent image definition and colors to white people are well content
Hello Marco buono lo scatto forse un po troppo rumore e il fuoco probabilmente non sull'occhio ma nel corpo, comunque ottima immagine per definizione e cromie i bianchi sono ben contenuti
Ciao Marco |
user8602 | sent on September 14, 2012 (9:17) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Quoto Marco50.
The photo is beautiful even if the light did not he certainly facilitated. Quoto Marco50.
La foto è bella anche se la luce non ti ha certo agevolato. |
| sent on September 14, 2012 (9:58) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Very beautiful. Molto bella. |
| sent on September 14, 2012 (10:17) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
A nice shot and subject, the sharpness of the feathers on the wing I conclude that Maf is not addressed in the eye. It 'also true, if it is not crop, when the photo is full frame, the "square" that indicate where the maf is no need to store it arrives and then compose the shot and shoot (always if the subject does not move in the meantime). few attention during PP and improves on white!
hello
In Un bello scatto e soggetto , dalla nitidezza del piumaggio sull'ala ne deduco che la Maf non è indirizzata sull'occhio .E' anche vero ,se non si tratta di crop , che quando la foto è a pieno formato , il " quadratino" che sta indicare il punto della maf non ci arriva ed occorre memorizzarla per poi comporre la foto e scattare (sempre se il soggetto non si muove nel frattempo ).qualche attenzione in fase di P.P. sui bianchi e migliora !!
ciao
Nello |
| sent on September 14, 2012 (12:05) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
as in ;-) come nello |
| sent on September 14, 2012 (13:05) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
As above Come sopra |
| sent on September 14, 2012 (13:37) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Great shot .. congratulations! Ottimo scatto..complimenti!! |
| sent on September 14, 2012 (14:03) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
In quoto! Quoto Nello!!! |
| sent on September 14, 2012 (14:29) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thank you all for the passage and in particular to Marco and In for technical advice.
I failed to mention that I used the extension tube, and was not made crop! The problem, as you say Nello, is that I would have to focus on the eye, and then re-center the subject. Instead I relied on the calculation of the PDC that, 340cm, 7.1, 400mm, is 1.7 cm ... but it was not so .... maybe for the effect of the pipe on which I did not find texts explaining how and what parameters affect, even if minimally since the measures at stake!
Thanks again
Mauro Grazie a tutti per il passaggio ed in particolare a Marco e Nello per i consigli tecnici.
Ho mancato di segnalare che ho usato il tubo di prolunga, e non è stato fatto crop! Il problema, come dici tu Nello, è che avrei dovuto mettere a fuoco l'occhio, per poi ricentrare il soggetto. Invece mi sono affidato al calcolo della PDC che,a 340cm, 7,1, 400mm, è di 1,7cm circa...ma non è stato cosi....forse per l'effetto del tubo sul quale non ho trovato testi che spiegano come e quali parametri intacca, anche se minimamente visto le misure in gioco!
Grazie ancora
Mauro |
| sent on September 14, 2012 (17:35) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
The use of extension tubes cause a loss of depth of field, brightness and MAF over long distances, which decreases with increasing thickness of the tubes. In addition, the Maf on close subjects is very precarious, always varies especially with little contrast.
hello
In L'utilizzo dei tubi di prolunga determinano una perdita di profondità di campo , di luminosità e la MAF sulle lunghe distanze , che si riduce con l'aumentare dello spessore dei tubi . In più la Maf sui soggetti ravvicinati è molto precaria , varia sempre specialmente con poco contrasto .
ciao
Nello |
| sent on September 14, 2012 (17:35) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
great shot ;-) a bit of noise ottimo scatto un po di rumore |
| sent on September 14, 2012 (18:03) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
great compliments ottima complimenti |
| sent on September 14, 2012 (20:51) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
excellent analysis of ollen ... then you know that these people are super-restless .. well done ... ottima l'analisi di ollen... poi si sa che questi soggetti sono super-irrequieti.. ben fatto... |
| sent on September 14, 2012 (21:12) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Very beautiful! Molto bella! |
| sent on September 14, 2012 (21:32) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
You have maintained a remarkable detail on the plumage and good on the subject in general, albeit with a reduced depth of field.
The noise is present, but with a little PP in the background you delete it entirely without the person affected.
Congratulations anyway for the full frame ... not easy to compose with a fixed and extension cords.
see you soon Hai mantenuto un dettaglio notevole sul piumaggio e buono sul soggetto in generale, pur con una profondità di campo ridotta.
Il rumore è presente, ma con poca PP sullo sfondo lo si elimina del tutto senza che il soggetto ne risenta.
Complimenti comunque per il pieno fotogramma... non facile da comporre con un fisso e le prolunghe.
a presto |
| sent on September 15, 2012 (14:33) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Very nice ;-) Molto bella |
| sent on September 15, 2012 (20:31) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thank you all for the commeti and steps!
I'm iniziiando to use CS5, I hope to eliminate the noise ch always accompanies me!: Fconfuso:
Good light to all!
Mauro Grazie a tutti per i commeti e i passaggi!!!
Sto iniziiando a usare CS5, spero di eliminare il rumore ch da sempre mi accompagna!!
Buona luce a tutti!!
Mauro |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
![[retina]](shared_files/layout/retina_badge.jpg){kind=icon}
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
10.1 MEGAPIXEL
Resize to fit window
