What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on March 19, 2017 (13:44) | This comment has been translated
Wonderful shot |
| sent on March 19, 2017 (13:51) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Pero '... to look good in hd head and' perfect, body and 'mixed as retail :-( Pero'... a guardarlo bene in hd la testa e' perfetta, il corpo e' impastato come dettaglio |
| sent on March 19, 2017 (14:41) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Beautiful specimen, great shot of an excellent sharpness. : -o: -o Bellissimo esemplare, ottimo scatto di un'eccellente nitidezza. |
| sent on March 19, 2017 (15:50) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I try to give my opinion about .....
I think it all depends on the shooting distance and of course the focal ...
If the shot has been taken to 6/7 mtr with an equivalent of 700 mm I see it hard that the whole body is within the
PDC ... has not even a sparrow !!!!!!!
Beyond 10/11 is another matter ....
Strepitosamente bellla .......
As usual the rest !!!!!
Greetings Robertino Provo a dare la mia opinione in merito.....
Penso che tutto dipenda dalla distanza di scatto ovviamente e dalla focale...
Se lo scatto è stato eseguito a 6/7 mtr con un equivalente di 700 mm la vedo dura che tutto il corpo rientri nella
PDC... mica è un passerotto!!!!!!!
Oltre i 10/11 è un altro discorso....
Strepitosamente bellla.......
Come al solito del resto!!!!!
Un saluto Robertino |
| sent on March 19, 2017 (16:03) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I believe that the head was parallel and body a bit 'at an angle, so not in perfect focus
It was to more than 10 meters definitely Credo che la testa fosse parallela e il corpo un po' in obliquo, quindi non perfettamente a fuoco
era a più di 10 metri sicuramente |
| sent on March 19, 2017 (18:15) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
A very good image, the depth of field at these distances is not help, unless the subject is not perfectly of profile. ;-) Un'ottima immagine, la profondità di campo a queste distanze non è di aiuto, a meno che il soggetto non sia perfettamente di profilo.  |
| sent on March 19, 2017 (19:00) | This comment has been translated
Very nice! |
| sent on March 20, 2017 (19:37) | This comment has been translated
Wonderful, congratulations |
| sent on March 21, 2017 (20:38) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I like the hair. Mi piace il capello. |
| sent on March 21, 2017 (21:33) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Very nice for PDR, light and background, congratulations! Molto bella per PDR, luce e sfondo, complimenti! |
| sent on March 22, 2017 (20:19) | This comment has been translated
Nice shot! |
| sent on March 25, 2017 (9:12) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
: -o wonderful for me .... I already happened several times to have the perfect head and the rest of focus but I think the reason is the one mentioned in relatively short distances and with no small subject everything in focus only when you fully parallel and however, between the eye and the body in this case at least 14/15 cm there are those ... maybe focus 9 max 10 (well I never used the 1.4x) you could get more ... maybe
ps ... the detail and sharpness of the IV makes this difference even more (I love my 5dIV :-D) per me stupenda....mi è gia successo diverse volte avere la testa perfetta e il resto sfuocato ma credo che il motivo sia quello già detto a distanze relativamente brevi e con soggetti non piccolissimi tutto a fuoco solo se perfettamente paralleli e comunque tra occhio e corpo in questo caso almeno quei 14/15 cm ci stanno...forse a fuoco 9 max 10( oltre non ho mai usato l'1,4x) si poteva avere di più ...forse
ps...il dettaglio e la nitidezza della IV rende questa differenza anche maggiore (I love my 5dIV ) |
| sent on March 27, 2017 (22:02) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
grebe in good light, nice! svasso in buona luce, bello! |
| sent on March 28, 2017 (14:35) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Beautiful shot, great pdr and subject detail.
Congratulations, Wainer :-) Splendido scatto, ottimo pdr e dettaglio soggetto.
Complimenti, Wainer |
| sent on March 28, 2017 (14:49) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
ITA, clearly defined and with a perfect pdr !!!
Compliments
Hello
Fabrizio Bellissimo scatto, ben definito e con un pdr perfetto!!!
Complimenti
Ciao
Fabrizio |
user19782 | sent on April 04, 2017 (17:18) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
To look good seems that the back
is closer than the head. Not even a bit.
At f / 8.0, also just over 10 meters, it seems "normal" a bit '
defocusing.
The shot is beautiful and the detail is outstanding.
Many congratulations and greetings
Fernando A guardarla bene sembra che il posteriore
sia più vicino rispetto alla testa. E neanche di pochissimo.
A f/8.0 , anche poco oltre i 10 metri, mi sembra "normale" un po'
di fuori fuoco.
Lo scatto è splendido ed il dettaglio è al top.
Tanti complimenti ed un saluto
Fernando |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
![[retina]](shared_files/layout/retina_badge.jpg){kind=icon}
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
6.0 MEGAPIXEL
Resize to fit window
