What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on January 18, 2017 (18:39) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Nice shoot Angelo!
How come the sky is a bit 'noisy?
Hi good evening!
Sergio ;-) :-P
Bella ripresa Angelo!
Come mai il cielo è un po' rumoroso?
Ciao, buona serata!
Sergio 
|
| sent on January 18, 2017 (21:21) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Hello,
nice shot!!!!!!
a greeting Bruno ciao,
bello scatto!!!!!!
un saluto Bruno |
| sent on January 19, 2017 (17:17) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thanks Bruno, a greeting ;-) grazie Bruno, un saluto |
user59947 | sent on January 27, 2017 (21:55) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Beautiful and nice pdr Splendida e bel pdr |
| sent on January 27, 2017 (22:03) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Ardian with the place lends itself ;-) grazie Ardian il posto si presta |
| sent on January 30, 2017 (18:22) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Overall I am not convinced by these reasons:
-rumorosità
-pastosità
-presence of falling lines
-inclinazione left
-composition asymmetrical
You have a good lens Oleg74 but there are always yield limits due to too small sensor (1 / 2.3).
For the noise you could choose a 100 max 200 iso
For lines were already falling to 24mm (equivalent to 35mm format), it could then withdraw leaving more air around and in post production corregegr the inclination and falling lines.
If in the future you think you always bet on a compact body but with greater quality rates a canon 1gxmark2 (1 inch sensor) or better yet a sony a6000 with 16-50mm (APSC sensor) ;-)
Hello, laurel
Nel complesso non mi convince per questi motivi:
-rumorosità
-pastosità
-presenza delle linee cadenti
-inclinazione a sx
-composizione asimetrica
Hai una buona lente Oleg74 ma ci sono sempre limiti di resa dovuti al sensore troppo piccolo (1/2,3).
Per la rumorosità si poteva scegliere un 100 max 200 iso più digeribili per questa compatta.
Per le linee cadenti eri già a 24mm (equivalenti a formato 35mm) , si poteva quindi arretrare lasciando più aria intorno e in post produzione corregere l'inclinazione eventuale e le linee cadenti.
Se in futuro pensi di puntare sempre su un corpo compatto ma con maggior qualità valuta una canon g1xmark2 (sensore 1pollice) una canon G7X Mark II (1pl) o meglio ancora una sony a6000 con 16-50mm (sensore apsC)
(imho)
Ciao, lauro
|
| sent on October 21, 2017 (17:21) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Beautiful angel perspective.
Hi Lu. :-P Bella la prospettiva Angelo.
Ciao Lu. |
| sent on October 23, 2017 (15:36) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
It is my pleasure to thank Luigi for his visit.
A greeting, Angel :-P E' con piacere che ringrazio Luigi della sua visita.
Un saluto, Angelo |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
![[retina]](shared_files/layout/retina_badge.jpg){kind=icon}
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
10.8 MEGAPIXEL
Resize to fit window
