RCE Foto

(i) On JuzaPhoto, please disable adblockers (let's see why!)






Login LogoutJoin JuzaPhoto!
JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you accept the use of cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.

OK, I confirm


  1. Galleries
  2. »
  3. Paesaggio con elementi umani
  4. » Church On The Crag

 
Church On The Crag...

Elementi Umani

View gallery (22 photos)

Church On The Crag sent on January 07, 2017 (16:14) by Light Robber. 42 comments, 839 views. [retina]

at 116mm, 1/1000 f/8.0, ISO 640, hand held.




View High Resolution 21.0 MP  



PAGE: ALL PAGES | NEXT PAGE »


What do you think about this photo?


Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?


You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 201000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.




avatarsenior
sent on January 10, 2017 (21:02) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Then we say that the time is wrong: flat light and very hard ... if I had taken in the morning or at sunset everything would be "softer." Not everything is lost, indeed: I find the subject interesting and well composed photo. I would try with a development in b / w

avatarsenior
sent on January 10, 2017 (21:02) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

I find the composition a bit 'tight, as in pp you have maintained a decent portion of dark space, the part of the foliage, I would have given more comprehensive, including more air to balance.

The light is not the best, but of course on what you already know and maybe you did not have time to wait for it to soften a bit '.

avatarsenior
sent on January 10, 2017 (21:20) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Thanks for the comments, in fact the time it was not ideal (around 13.30 with a bright sun). It is dark it is not bilianciato with the clear sky. I have to try again from another location in order to maintain the tower on the left and even the church. I try also the version in black and white since they are not practical absence of color.

avatarsenior
sent on January 10, 2017 (22:34) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Hello and welcome. I see many of my pictures in this, even I have been very concerned about churches and monuments especially in the first period and I also found myself taking pictures at times impossible, with dishes skies like this, with so many elements to soil composition as in this case trees. Then I see that you have not used a tripod and you're not perfectly level. So from here we start, I sense your enthusiasm and this is of utmost importance, this group is helping me more than I had planned to improve or at least to notice these and many other aspects that often escape those who like us all ' beginning. Greetings and welcome renewal

avatarsenior
sent on January 10, 2017 (22:55) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

The view is nice to see. Unfortunately there are errors of youth that we all did at the beginning (I still do them now :-D). The light is too hard, the best times are at dawn and dusk.
For the rest is filled with disturbing elements, like the branches that cover almost the entire facade of the church, unfortunately though it seems quite disturbing.
The lower left corner is completely dark.

For me definitely try again.

avatarsenior
sent on January 10, 2017 (23:10) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Thank you so much Fiosco and Pierre. No doubt I will return with stand and a more appropriate time. For I will have to look for a location where branches disturb less, although I see it hard eliminate them entirely on this facade.

user75655
avatar
sent on January 10, 2017 (23:23) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Hello Light Robber, I join those who preceded me. I also believe that the shaded part to take away importance to the church and I find that the sky is flat. It has been suggested to try to shoot at different times and I can only spur you to do so. It is amazing how the right time of day can highlight more effectively the same subject.

Ps that church?

avatarsenior
sent on January 11, 2017 (6:11) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Thanks NievesY is the Holy Trinity church of Monte Carasso shooting from the valley of Sementina.

avatarsupporter
sent on January 11, 2017 (7:24) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Shooting that way there is no hope ... the branches can not take them off. Soon will come the leaves and you will see the facade. You have many other angles to take it well. Test, test, test. Good job!

avatarjunior
sent on January 11, 2017 (8:35) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Hello, the church looks beautiful, but in my opinion there is too much black on the bottom left covering the subject. It seems very bright and clear.
Giuseppe

avatarjunior
sent on January 11, 2017 (8:39) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Hello and welcome, as mentioned by others the left and dark and does not add much, considering the way I tried to show more the cliff (if possible) excluding the dark forest.
Hello

user81826
avatar
sent on January 11, 2017 (9:51) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Hello, I shoot like enough and although it is true that the light is not exactly "Photographic," I find it very natural shot in both colors in the light that make me think more like a "family outing" that proper photographic output (not that make a difference!).
The positives for me to end here, however, since the point of recovery is very sacrificed, from which you pulled out probably the best but that just was not chosen.
So the starting point is for me the next time choose a pdr really interesting and deserves, then once found naturally take in more interesting weather.
Paul

user72446
avatar
sent on January 11, 2017 (14:05) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

You could try it in black and white? because so 'the trees would give a touch to the picture more' '' dark '' and the white of the sky would give a different tone to the photo, because the light is not 'just considered optimal time !!!!

A greeting!

user39791
avatar
sent on January 11, 2017 (14:11) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

In my opinion it too tight framing and part in shadow is too high for the balance of the photo. In general we should propose publicly photos that go beyond the souvenir photos of trip, which ends all too often to be just as interesting as the subject immortalized for those who have taken and a few others.

avatarjunior
sent on January 11, 2017 (15:52) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Too many elements that disturb the eye and a bit 'too dark at the bottom. The sharpness of the church is really good.

bye Bye

avatarsenior
sent on January 11, 2017 (18:03) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

A nice souvenir photo ;-)
David

avatarjunior
sent on January 11, 2017 (19:29) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

It would be a nice picture, but you would have done better to frame further to the right because the trees in the foreground do not say anything while the view perhaps would have been more impressive. Doing so would have taken a greater portion of the sky and you could play on what to give "body" to the photo. Quiet'm a newbie too, observations help to improve ;-) :-) :-)

avatarjunior
sent on January 11, 2017 (19:35) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Hello Light Robber
and welcome also from me

Difficult shot you have chosen as a slide
tough light, but the composition is not bad in my opinion

I see three floors
the first, the trees, too dark
the second, the church, sacrificed by the hard light
and of the mountain and sky background a little bland

touch you come back a little of times
and my humble advice (from beginner to novice) is to concentrate on the composition, leaving out the rest.
;-)

avatarsenior
sent on January 11, 2017 (20:48) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Thank you all for the comments. Is no doubt I will be back and I will treasure your cosigli. This façade and position intrigues me. The front is nice but I already put in several pictures and is the part that everyone sees. The other side, and made worse as trees. Behind and praticamante against mountain. Maybe if I go down to the level of the stream becomes more interesting.

avatarsenior
sent on January 12, 2017 (10:45) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

As I do not mind the composition, perhaps a bit 'tight but do not know what was around. The real problem is the light. The idea of ??the castle that rises in the branches is cute, potentially dramatic, but to make the most of you would have had to take another time, with another light. So there's just a huge black spot which occupy most of the frame and a piece of the castle that is visible ...




Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)
PAGE: ALL PAGES | NEXT PAGE »



Some comments may have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator.  Microsoft Translator



 ^

JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.

Mobile Version - juza.ea@gmail.com - Terms of use and Privacy - P. IVA 01501900334 - REA 167997- PEC juzaphoto@pec.it

May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me