What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on January 05, 2017 (19:29) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Beautiful... a salute Francis Bella... un saluto Francesco |
| sent on January 05, 2017 (19:47) | This comment has been translated
Thanks a lot! |
| sent on January 06, 2017 (7:57) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Great beautiful portrait! Compliemnti! Bosley Gran bel ritratto! Compliemnti! Bosley |
| sent on January 06, 2017 (9:04) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Very beautiful. I love the tone ;-) Molto bella. Mi piacciono molto le tonalità |
user98978 | sent on January 06, 2017 (9:18) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Excellent, does just winter :-) Eccellente, fa proprio inverno |
| sent on January 06, 2017 (9:25) | This comment has been translated
Thank you all! |
| sent on January 06, 2017 (12:43) | This comment has been translated
Very nice! |
| sent on January 06, 2017 (13:31) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thank you so much Andrea :) Grazie mille Andrea :) |
| sent on January 06, 2017 (14:50) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
A beautiful gallery. I think you are getting the right balance of contrast and saturation. The result is amazing! :-) :-)
A greeting Stephen Una bellissima galleria. Secondo me hai trovato il giusto equilibrio tra contrasto e saturazione. Il risultato è strabiliante! Un saluto Stefano |
| sent on January 06, 2017 (15:32) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thank you very much Stefano! Grazie mille Stefano! |
user2943 | sent on February 24, 2017 (16:46) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Congratulations Andrew, small view it very well. I was considering the 85mm 1.2 and I zoomed in at 100%, we notice a nice front focus. You put a focus on eyes? or has stoner machine? Complimenti Andrea, vista piccola rende molto bene. Stavo valutando l'85mm 1.2 ed ho ingrandito al 100%, noto un bel front focus. Hai messo a fuoco sugli occhi? oppure ha cannato la macchina? |
| sent on February 25, 2017 (1:28) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Hello and thanks! Generally I always put focus on the eyes, and even a this case it seems to me it happened like this .. I would not like seeing an online file version may seem out of the game since the lenses until now have seemed perfect;) Ciao e grazie! In genere metto sempre a fuoco sugli occhi, e anche un questo caso mi sembra sia andata così.. Non vorrei che vedendo una versione del file online possa sembrare fuori gioco dato che le lenti fino ad ora mi sono sembrate perfette ;) |
user2943 | sent on February 26, 2017 (0:57) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Ok, then it's probably a problem in single click. Not seeing sharp eyes I tried the focus point, looking at the axis of the bench (in the first 45 degrees is better known), you see that the maf is a few centimeters below the boom, which in turn should stay ahead the facial line. I know that in 1.2 of FF is almost impossible to focus with precision, but I wanted to understand if it is physiological or there are also well-calibrated optics and repeatable results. I will not put the flea in his ear, then again, it could be the single shot to have problems. Hello Ok, allora è forse un problema nel singolo scatto. Non vedendo nitidi gli occhi ho cercato il punto di messa a fuoco, guardando le assi della panchina (nel primo a 45 gradi si nota meglio), si vede che la maf è qualche cm più avanti del braccio, che a sua volta dovrebbe stare avanti alla linea del viso. So bene che a 1.2 su FF è quasi impossibile mettere a fuoco con precisione ma volevo capire se è fisiologico o esistono anche ottiche ben tarate e con risultati ripetibili. Non voglio metterti la pulce nell'orecchio, ripeto, potrebbe essere il singolo scatto ad avere problemi. ciao |
| sent on February 27, 2017 (10:11) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I do not think it is a calibration problem, some shots leggernete out of focus always comes out, considering that I did not snap on the stand and not photographer inanimate subjects. Even moving the minimum of me or the girl can lead to a possible out of focus, even if slight;) Non credo sia un problema di taratura, qualche scatto leggernete fuori fuoco esce sempre, considera che io non scatto sul cavalletto e non fotografo soggetti inanimati. Uno spostamento anche minimo da parte mia o della ragazza può portare ad un eventuale fuori fuoco, anche se leggero ;) |
| sent on June 09, 2017 (17:54) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Beautiful! A greeting, Christiano. Bella! Un saluto, Christiano. |
| sent on June 09, 2017 (17:56) | This comment has been translated
Thank you! |
| sent on June 12, 2017 (13:54) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Great in everything !!! Andrew Ottima in tutto!!! Andrea |
| sent on June 12, 2017 (14:25) | This comment has been translated
Thank you! |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |