JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here
Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
user81826
sent on October 21, 2016 (17:19) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
In broad daylight, in those conditions I would have taken at least f / 7.1 or better f / 8-f / 9. The composition is totally to be reviewed since the lateral cuts are really bad, both on the home and on plants. Attract much attention ruining a beautiful view. There are compositional lines that draw attention instead is the slope of the houses suggests that the horizon is slightly crooked. The PDR is flat, uninteresting. The colors are radioactive. They are fine but must be removed vividness and saturation. Good light moment with clouds although waiting an hour or more came out definitely the longest and interesting shadows. In short, a nice place but I would work on different things. In pieno giorno, in quelle condizioni avrei scattato almeno a f/7.1 o meglio f/8-f/9. La composizione è totalmente da rivedere visto che i tagli laterali sono davvero pessimi, sia sulla casa che sulle piante. Attirano l'attenzione tantissimo rovinando un bel panorama. Non ci sono linee compositive che attirino l'attenzione invece, è la pendenza delle case fa pensare che l'orizzonte sia leggermente storto. Il pdr è piatto, poco interessante. I colori sono radioattivi. Vanno bene ma va tolta vividezza e saturazione. Buono il momento di luce con le nubi anche se aspettando un'oretta o più uscivano fuori sicuramente ombre più lunghe ed interessanti. Insomma, bello il posto ma lavorerei su diverse cose e inserirei un titolo più significativo del soggetto visto che le dolomiti si intravedono e basta.
sent on October 30, 2016 (20:18) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Only now I read your comment. I thank you for all the suggestions, although sometimes heavy and subjective (radioactive colors?). I did not think I was taking an exam. Even the title do not like it .............. left lateral shear definitely exasperated by the wide angle, bad ........ my mom. Thanks anyway Leggo solo adesso il tuo commento. Ti ringrazio per tutti i suggerimenti, anche se a volte pesanti e soggettivi (colori radioattivi?). Non pensavo che stavo sostenendo un esame. Anche il titolo non ti va bene.............. Taglio laterale sinistro sicuramente esasperato dal grandangolo, pessimo........mamma mia. Grazie comunque
sent on October 13, 2019 (9:56) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Eh yes... Sorry to receive heavy criticism of your photos... That's why you should be a little more gracious in massacring other people's photos... Meditate people... Meditate... 8-) Eh si... Dispiace ricevere critiche pesanti sulle proprie foto... Per questo bisognerebbe avere un poco più di garbo nel massacrare le foto altrui... Meditate gente... Meditate...
![[retina]](shared_files/layout/retina_badge.jpg){kind=icon}
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
24.2 MEGAPIXEL
Resize to fit window
