monster | JuzaPhoto

JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.

OK, I confirm

You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept Cookies

Customize

Refuse Cookies

Galleries
Pets

16.3 MEGAPIXEL

Resize to fit window

XE1-n°2 View gallery (21 photos)

monster sent on May 23, 2016 (9:20) by Efus. 4 comments, 553 views.

1/250 f/8.0, ISO 320, hand held.

Industar 50-2

View High Resolution 16.3 MP

3 persons like it: Fiorenzo Sagoni, Maluc, Mike43

What do you think about this photo?

Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?

You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.

Mb339

sent on May 24, 2016 (16:38) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Good morning Efus,

I do not like the title! This poor little dog would need treatment and not of offenses. Additionally you cut part of the front legs and the top view is incorrect. Children and animals is part of their height.

Greetings.

Graziano.

Efus

sent on May 25, 2016 (10:01) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

MB339 "monster" is an obviously ironic title and the little dog in question is more than taken care of, has not even a stray, has only a little 'undershot that does not cause any problem and it is useless to treat as it is expected to undergo an invasive.

The aesthetic judgment fault it, although I personally do not mind the high angle for both dogs and children, then specifically the cut could be better but sometimes I prefer to take a picture although with a bad cut over the do not do it at all.

:-D Thanks for the transition and for the opinion, criticism is always constructive.

Maluc

sent on May 29, 2016 (18:13) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Hello Efus, then ... then, you know what I do not like? or rather like little? The "legs" of the master ... :-D Perquanto concerns the paw of the little dog as it define you, I have to quote MB339 and add the queue. As for shooting from 'high, because NO ... it's not the law. As there is no need to apply the law to force "The rule of thirds." The set does not bother me at all.
A greeting
Maluc

Efus	sent on May 30, 2016 (13:20) \| This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original) Heheh the master if you see it from swerving, shoes are just a taste ... let's say you know XD found (very good person but eh As usual thanks for your ward, always reasoned and acceptable.

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

Some comments may have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator.