RCE Foto

(i) On JuzaPhoto, please disable adblockers (let's see why!)






Login LogoutJoin JuzaPhoto!
JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.


OK, I confirm


You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept CookiesCustomizeRefuse Cookies


  1. Galleries
  2. »
  3. Journalism/Street
  4. » Insistent signs / Confused

 
Insistent signs / Confused...

Cina e Hong Kong

View gallery (20 photos)

Insistent signs / Confused sent on May 01, 2016 (21:14) by Walter Colombo. 10 comments, 473 views. [retina]

, 1/400 f/8.0, ISO 200, hand held.

Caos di insegne a Mong Kok, Hong Kong. Vecchio scatto rivisitato. Un posto la cui confusione amo particolarmente.



View High Resolution 10.9 MP  



What do you think about this photo?


Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?


You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.




user81257
avatar
sent on May 05, 2016 (9:40) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Oh yes, very confusing :-D
The vertical cut is good for us, the composition is good.
But they do not convince the lights and shadows. In the sense, the sky is probably burned. In a BN release it is also there, but if we find just below a fully black area, then I will create a contrast sometimes too incisive.
Many signs are dark, almost not to read the ideograms present.
I would have played better with the lights and shadows, closing the first and opening the second.
MC.

avatarsenior
sent on May 05, 2016 (14:24) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Hello Walter, I think it is a great b & n, the confusion is the point readable forteeeee between the lights and shadows, the vertical cut like, congratulations 8-)

Claudio C

avatarsenior
sent on May 06, 2016 (1:00) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

It makes good 'idea of ??chaos, resulting in rejection or attraction. A cross section d 'Orient.

avatarsupporter
sent on May 06, 2016 (11:34) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Thank you all first.
Lights and shadows are determined and marked given the strong backlight, close the lights on the BN seems to me a shame, let's leave them white and burnt, inconsistent with the blacks, this I always say. The blacks you're not wrong, open and lighten avreebbe made more readable signs. Regarding the cross-section of the East Thank Wladimiro to which I say that is not very good shooting to make the atmosphere of the place.
A greeting,
Walter

avatarsenior
sent on May 06, 2016 (11:51) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Beautiful pictures as mentioned above blacks perhaps excessive, especially on the left, are likely to make the picture difficult to read. Nevertheless it gives an idea of ??the confusion of these metropolises.
hello 8-)

avatarsupporter
sent on May 06, 2016 (14:19) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Thanks Matthew.
A greeting,
Walter

avatarsenior
sent on May 09, 2016 (14:49) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

the composition according to me it is fine, I like the content of the picture and how it was framed.
what I do not like is the black and white. the contrast so marked, but especially so many details in a part of the frame throughout underexposed makes you never want to look after 2 seconds, losing totally intresse.
I think you could get a lot more with a more careful management of shades.

avatarsupporter
sent on May 09, 2016 (21:29) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Thanks again Daniel,
What do you mean by accurate tonal management? There was not much to play in my opinion, the contrast and the harsh light were part of reality.
If you feel like you around the raw and make me a concrete example, so to understand.
A greeting,
Walter

avatarsenior
sent on May 10, 2016 (8:10) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Certainly, he runs well.

avatarsupporter
sent on May 10, 2016 (22:00) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Give me an email and I'll get right in MP.
Hello,
Walter


RCE Foto

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

Some comments may have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator.  Microsoft Translator



 ^

JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.

Mobile Version - juza.ea@gmail.com - Terms of use and Privacy - Cookie Preferences - P. IVA 01501900334 - REA 167997- PEC juzaphoto@pec.it

May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me