What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on April 03, 2016 (18:15) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Short depth of field, why f4? read below, the question of shutter speed then. Apart from that, great subject well taken! Profondità di campo ridotta, come mai f4 ? letto sotto, questione di tempo di scatto quindi. A parte questo, gran soggetto ben ripreso! |
| sent on April 03, 2016 (19:40) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
We read the great commitment and great work .... and click! So much envy! Congratulations, but I wondered why you do not even move away a bit with the car; You would earn a little bit in the pdc and then it would not be too tight. Greetings Roger Si legge il grande impegno e grande lavoro....e che scatto! Tanta invidia! Complimenti, mi chiedevo però perché non ti allontani ancora un po con la macchina; guadagneresti un pochino in p.d.c. e poi non sarebbe troppo stretta. Un saluto Roger |
| sent on April 03, 2016 (23:08) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Great shot and great work ... I learned a lot from continuous quest'workshop ... R. Grande scatto e ottimo lavoro...ho imparato parecchio da quest'workshop continuo... R. |
| sent on April 05, 2016 (13:35) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I try to respond to the just observations; then I used f4 for two reasons. The first and main one is that I do not know in advance if you arrive during the day or night, I could almost bet on the night but really that you know how it ends ... so I f4 parmette to have a decent background in natural light. I therefore preferred to dose the flash according to the twilight shooting settings so that, in case the lightning per day was completely irrelevant exposure. I do not know if I am given to understand ... I do not go away because I have no space behind: D, this is 200mm, as I wrote to be made at 150 or 135 mm) ... Let's say that in essence do not seek the quiet shutter and safe, I prefer to throw 1000 photos and get one "epic" rather than 1000 photos all made bane but who do not know anything ... I'm working on it: D! Cerco di rispondervi alle giuste osservazioni; allora ho usato f4 per due motivi. Il primo e principale è che non so a priori se arriverà di giorno o notte, potrei quasi scommettere sulla notte ma poi tanto si sa come va a finire...quindi f4 mi parmette di avere uno sfondo decente in luce naturale. Ho quindi preferito dosare il flash in base alle impostazioni di scatto del crepuscolo in modo che, nel caso, il lampo a giorno era del tutto ininfluente sull'esposizione. Non so se mi son fatto intendere...Non mi allontano perchè dietro non ho spazio :D, questa è 200mm, come ho scritto va fatta a 150 o 135 mm ;)...Diciamo che in buona sostanza non cerco lo scatto tranquillo e sicuro, preferisco buttare 1000 foto e averne una "epica" piuttosto che 1000 foto tutte fatte bane ma che non sanno di nulla...ci sto lavorando :D! |
| sent on April 06, 2016 (7:17) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thanks for the prompt replies and clarifications; congratulations again for the great determination and technical capacity. Greetings Roger. Grazie per le puntuali risposte e precisazioni; complimenti ancora per la grande determinazione e capacità tecnica. Un saluto Roger. |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |