What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on February 26, 2016 (20:11) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
shots ebella beautiful maiden, appreciable her curves that give a genuine and spontaneous femininity. Hello Mat Belli scatti ebella fanciulla, apprezzabili le sue curve che le donano una femminilità genuina e spontanea. Ciao Mat |
| sent on February 26, 2016 (21:05) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thanks Mat, you beautiful girl, not really spontaneous but ... on the other hand it's not a professional :-) Grazie Mat, si bella fanciulla non proprio spontanea però...d'altronde non è mica una professionista |
user67391 | sent on March 01, 2016 (6:31) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Bella Michele. And I speak not only of the model, even in the choice of location, the colors and framing. Bella Michele. E non parlo della sola modella, a anche per la scelta della location, i colori e l'inquadratura. |
| sent on March 01, 2016 (10:09) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thanks Andrea!!! Grazie Andrea!!! |
| sent on March 04, 2016 (19:32) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Too bad, though, for the focal endeavored ....... Peccato , però, per la focale adoperata....... |
| sent on March 05, 2016 (0:15) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Hello Francop were advising me what ??? Ciao Francop cosa mi consigliavi??? |
| sent on March 05, 2016 (21:22) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Hi Michele, Rated very positively for your "girls" series of images, which is not bad. The photo, in my opinion, leaves something 'to be desired is this, that actually has some beautiful colors. I would have chosen a 'picture so the model is not the center of the image, but above all I would not have used a focal which is very wide: see the shoes, feet and legs of the model as They are disproportionate to the rest of the body? These tricks, as you know, make them wide-angle optics which in addition to other distortions, also introduce the perspective distortion, as in this case, it does appear larger neighboring things (objective) and shrinks the farthest. I assume that you used the zoom 16-35, with very close to focal length to 16; (correct me if I'm wrong). See instead as the subject became more valuable in those photos taken with the 70-200 mm.? That said, I want to point out that these are just my personal thoughts, and can also leave the time they find; because in each picture what counts is the intention of the photographer. Hello, :-P Francop. Ciao Michele, Voto molto positivamente per la tua serie d'immagini "girls", che non è per niente male. La foto che,secondo me, lascia un po' a desiderare è questa, che in realtà ha delle belle cromie. Avrei scelto un' inquadratura posizionando la modella non al centro dell'immagine, ma soprattutto non avrei usato una focale che è molto grandangolare: vedi le scarpe, i piedi e le gambe della modella come sono sproporzionati rispetto al resto del corpo ? Questi scherzetti, come tu sai, li fanno le ottiche grandangolari che oltre alle altre distorsioni, introducono anche la distorsione prospettica, come in questo caso, che fa apparire più grandi le cose vicine (all'obiettivo) e rimpicciolisce le più lontane. Presumo che avrai adoperato lo zoom 16-35, con la focale impostata molto vicina al 16; (correggimi se sbaglio). Vedi invece come il soggetto è più valorizzato in quelle foto scattate con il 70-200 mm.? Detto questo, voglio precisare che queste sono solo mie considerazioni personali, e che possono anche lasciare il tempo che trovano; perché in ogni immagine quello che conta è l'intento del fotografo. Ciao, Francop. |
| sent on March 06, 2016 (9:08) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Francop Thanks for the advice, it is true that it is not the best from a technical point of view but ... but I tried this wide-angle effect, and unfortunately I could not have wished otherwise the subject in addition to the legs discorceva all ;-) ;-) goodbye see you soon... Grazie Francop per i consigli, è vero che non è il massimo dal punto di vista tecnico anzi... ma questo effetto grandangolo lo cercato, e purtroppo non ho potuto desiderare il soggetto altrimenti oltre alle gambe si discorceva tutta ciao alla prossima... |
| sent on March 06, 2016 (19:30) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
and unfortunately I could not wish for the person otherwise than in the legs is discorceva whole .... sorry, I did not understand ...... Hello, Francop. e purtroppo non ho potuto desiderare il soggetto altrimenti oltre alle gambe si discorceva tutta .... scusa, non ho capito bene...... Ciao, Francop. |
| sent on March 06, 2016 (23:15) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Excuse, as you pointed out I had to centrally locate the girl otherwise deformed too :-) Scusa, come mi hai fatto notare ho dovuto posizionare centralmente la ragazza altrimenti si deformava troppo |
| sent on March 07, 2016 (14:18) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Ok, now I understand. Thanks and continues to photograph. Hello and good light! francop Ok, adesso ho compreso. Grazie e continua a fotografare. Ciao e buona luce! Francop |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |