What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on January 04, 2016 (15:52) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Great photo Carlo!
.... You've got 58 F1.4 Nikon ?? Gran foto Carlo!
....ti sei preso il 58 F1.4 Nikon?? |
| sent on January 04, 2016 (17:12) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thanks Massimiliano and especially Happy New Year !! ;-)
I sold all three 50 I had to buy it: 1.2 AIS; AFS and AFS 1.4 1.8 SE
I've got also added the rest !!
But it's too good, not so much for the clarity as to the blurred and the three-dimensional depth.
From what can be deduced from your "like" you are particularly interested in the pictures! Or am I wrong?
Regards Carlo Grazie Massimiliano e soprattutto Buon Anno!!
Ho venduto tutti e tre i 50 che avevo per comprarlo: 1.2 AIS; 1.4 AFS e 1.8 AFS S.E. e
c'ho anche aggiunto il resto!!
Però è troppo bello, non tanto per la nitidezza quanto per lo sfocato e la profondità tridimensionale.
Da quanto si deduce dai tuoi "mi piace" sei particolarmente interessato ai ritratti! O sbaglio?
Saluti Carlo |
| sent on January 05, 2016 (19:55) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I was not particularly pleased, although many speak well.
Keep in mind that the adjustment should be done at the end of M F.
As definition is better 1.8 but the fuzzy 1.4 is superior.
For me, 58 is better than both is as detailed as that fuzzy, not to mention the three-dimensionality.
But the price difference is probably unjustified. The alternative could be the big and heavy Sigma,
which they say is crystal clear. Nikon someone was selling on the market, near Rome, 58 around 1200 E.
Think carefully before making hasty decisions.
Good evening,
Carlo Io non ne ero particolarmente soddisfatto, anche se molti ne parlano bene.
Tieni presente che va fatta la regolazione fine della M a F.
Come definizione è meglio l'1.8 ma lo sfocato del 1.4 è superiore.
Per me il 58 è migliore di entrambe sia come dettaglio che come sfocato, per non parlare della tridimensionalità.
Però la differenza di prezzo è forse ingiustificata. L'alternativa potrebbe essere il grosso e pesante Sigma,
che dicono sia nitidissimo. Sul mercatino Nital qualcuno vendeva, vicino Roma, il 58 intorno ai 1200 E.
Pensaci bene prima di fare scelte frettolose.
Buona serata,
Carlo |
| sent on January 06, 2016 (12:36) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Your wise words !!
Thanks for the advice!
Massimiliano Parole sagge le tue!!
Grazie del parere!
Massimiliano |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
![[retina]](shared_files/layout/retina_badge.jpg){kind=icon}
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
17.2 MEGAPIXEL
Resize to fit window
