What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on July 25, 2015 (21:57) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
The dragonfly is shooting very well with great detail!
I did not end background and low light on the subject, personal opinion, then tell me if you want the title !!!
See you soon Luigi La libellula è ripresa benissimo con ottimo dettaglio!
Non mi finisce sfondo e luce scarsa sul soggetto, parere personale, poi se hai voglia spiegami il titolo!!!
A presto Luigi |
| sent on July 26, 2015 (9:34) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Hello!
I'm learning ..... Neither do I like the background. Maybe I held the ISO to 100, reduces the time to me ..... 40? 30? (More or less ....). Then yes, the background was blurred (somewhat '...) .... I explained? Then, he went on .....
The dragonfly has snout that makes me think of a movie "Phantom of the Paradise," directed by Brian De Palma
a greeting
ciao!
Sto imparando.....Neanche a me piace lo sfondo. Forse avrei tenuto gli ISO a 100, mi riduce i tempi a .....40?30?(più o meno ....). Allora sì,lo sfondo era più sfuocato(un po'...)....mi sono spiegato ? Poi, è andata via.....
La libellula ha muso che mi fa venire in mente un film " Il fantasma del palcoscenico ", di Brian De Palma
un saluto
|
| sent on July 26, 2015 (10:34) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
“ Maybe I held the ISO to 100, it reduces the time to ..... 40? 30? (More or less ....). Then yes, the background was blurred (somewhat '...) .... I explained „
Maybe I do not understand, but without prejudice to the time and wanting a background is not present would have been sufficient to reduce the sensitivity so that you can also open the diaphragm decreasing the pdc, and at the same time offsetting the light would hit the sensor.
However, the presence or absence of the background if this is not very invasive is not a problem, partly because there are two schools of thought, which is preferred in a classic neutral and the other varied. Also important is also the optics and the distance between background and subject. Clear that a 180 will have the option of offeringrts fuzzy best course of 100 at the same distance and aperture.
In this case a bit of flash would have dropped the shadows making more visible the subject. " Forse avrei tenuto gli ISO a 100, mi riduce i tempi a .....40?30?(più o meno ....). Allora sì,lo sfondo era più sfuocato(un po'...)....mi sono spiegato"
Forse sono io a non capire, ma fermo restando il tempo e volendo uno sfondo meno presente sarebbe si stato sufficiente diminuire la sensibilità così da poter aprire anche il diaframma diminuendo la pdc, e nello stesso tempo controbilanciando la luce che avrebbe colpito il sensore.
Comunque la presenza o meno dello sfondo se questo non è molto invasivo non è un problema, anche perchè esistono due scuole di pensiero, dove in una si predilige il classico neutro e l'altra il variegato. Importante è anche anche l'ottica e la distanza tra sfondo e soggetto. Chiaro che un 180 avrà la possibilità di regalarti uno sfocato migliore del 100 naturalmente a parità di distanza e diaframma.
In questo caso un colpo di flash avrebbe diminuito le ombre rendendo più visibile il soggetto. |
| sent on July 26, 2015 (15:12) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
No, no .... you understand very well! I am, that I messed up! then, if I understand it: the times, 1/80. f 13, and ISO 400 (+ or -). Right? Wow!
I come from a stroke ... So if a message is not correct, please excuse me.
Congratulations on your photos are beautiful ... !!!
a greeting No,no....tu capisci benissimo! Sono io,che ho fatto confusione! quindi,se non ho capito male: i tempi , 1/80. f 13, e iso 400(+ o -). Esatto?
Vengo da un ictus...Quindi, se un messaggio è non corretto,vogliate scusarmi.
Complimenti per le tue fotografie...sono bellissime!!!
Un saluto |
| sent on September 07, 2015 (22:02) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Well I'm reading the review of Pigi47 is learning well myself that with age not take in more or worse forget we only try to defend ourselves with a thank you.
Greetings Marino Sto leggendo pure io la recensione di Pigi47 sta imparando pure il sottoscritto che con l'età non assimila più o peggio dimentica cerchiamo solo di difenderci con un grazie.
Un saluto Marino |
| sent on September 11, 2015 (15:21) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
;-)  |
| sent on October 26, 2015 (13:01) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
ITA with a bokeh scary :). Complimentoni. Bellissimo scatto con un bokeh da paura :). Complimentoni. |
| sent on July 12, 2017 (10:20) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I like it and, in this case, the background a little confused actually does not find it bad, indeed it enhances the context. A me piace e, in questo caso, lo sfondo un po' confuso in realtà non lo trovo male, anzi valorizza il contesto. |
| sent on July 12, 2017 (13:15) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thank you all!!
A greeting Grazie a tutti!!
un saluto |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
![[retina]](shared_files/layout/retina_badge.jpg){kind=icon}
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
4.8 MEGAPIXEL
Resize to fit window
