What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on June 24, 2015 (21:00) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Hello Alexander, I like the cut but I struggle to understand the choice of 1600iso with tripod. Maybe you did it because you wanted at all costs a diaphragm rather closed. In doing so, however, the shot is a bit 'noisy. I opted for a diaphragm brighter, maybe not, but at least a 2.0 4.0 reducing iso. It also does not convince me the light, too flat and cold.
Mark Ciao Alessandro, mi piace il taglio ma fatico a capire la scelta dei 1600iso con treppiede. Forse l'hai fatto perchè volevi a tutti i costi un diaframma piuttosto chiuso. Così facendo però lo scatto è un po' rumoroso. Avrei optato per un diaframma più luminoso, magari non 2.0 ma almeno un 4.0 riducendo gli iso. Inoltre non mi convince la luce, troppo piatta e fredda. Marco |
| sent on June 25, 2015 (11:25) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Hello Marco! Thank you for your comments and your opinion, as always interesting and useful. Unfortunately it did not enter lots of natural light from the window, being late afternoon and facing east, so I had to make compromises (taking into account that this photo is very amateur). The diaphragm closed so I used it to make sure you have a good sharpness and depth of field to make sure even if the fire did not fall exactly on the eye (unfortunately it is a self-portrait and being alone, focusing on exact ' eye it found it difficult if not impossible). Being almost always the other side of the camera, sometimes I leave and I do pull some self, never having many pictures of me being the one that clicks. -D I'll try to make it a remake conditions idonee probably! I thank you for the comment Marco, see you soon! :-) Ciao Marco! Grazie per il tuo commento ed il tuo parere, come sempre interessante ed utile. Purtroppo non entrava molta luce naturale dalla finestra, essendo tardo pomeriggio ed esposta a est, per cui ho dovuto fare dei compromessi (tenendo conto che questa foto è molto amatoriale). Il diaframma così chiuso l'ho usato per essere sicuro di avere una buona nitidezza ed assicurarmi una profondità di campo anche se il fuoco non cadeva esattamente sull'occhio (purtroppo trattandosi di un autoritratto ed essendo da solo, la messa a fuoco esatta sull'occhio mi risultava difficile se non impossibile). Essendo praticamente sempre dall'altra parte della fotocamera, ogni tanto mi lascio tirare e mi faccio qualche autoritratto, non avendo mai molte foto mie essendo quello che le scatta. Proverò a farne un remake in condizioni più idonee probabilmente! Ti ringrazio per il commento Marco, a presto! |
| sent on June 25, 2015 (11:54) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Imagine! We wait for the remake then, I imagined I had to compromise. :)
Mark Figurati! Attendiamo il remake allora, immaginavo fossi dovuto scendere a compromessi. :) Marco |
| sent on September 04, 2015 (0:18) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Shooting gorgeous!
Federico Scatto stupendo! Federico |
| sent on September 04, 2015 (0:21)
Quality. |
| sent on September 06, 2015 (0:03) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thank you very much Federico, very kind! Really kind Timk2, thank you very much! :-) Grazie mille Federico, molto gentile! Really kind Timk2, thank you very much! |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |