What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on June 23, 2015 (18:52) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
A test photos taken with the Canon 5Ds!
I shot at f / 8, which is the smaller aperture that can be used on sensors with pixels so small to have perfect clarity; already af / 11 diffraction is felt (although it is still acceptable), while f / 16 on the diffraction compromises the detail. Of course, nothing prevents you shoot at f / 16 or f / 22, which not only takes advantage of the real resolution of the sensor.
I recommend you look at full resolution: www.juzaphoto.com/hr.php?t=1386261&r=80837&l=it
A cutout 100% (click on the picture to enlarge it):
Una foto di test scattata con la Canon 5Ds!
Ho scattato a f/8, che è il diaframma più chiuso che si può utilizzare su sensori con pixel così piccoli per avere una nitidezza perfetta; già a f/11 la diffrazione si fa sentire (anche se è ancora accettabile), mentre da f/16 in poi la diffrazione compromette il dettaglio. Ovviamente nulla vieta di scattare a f/16 o f/22, solo che non si sfrutta la reale risoluzione del sensore.
Vi consiglio di guardarla a piena risoluzione: www.juzaphoto.com/hr.php?t=1386261&r=80837&l=it
Un ritaglio al 100% (cliccate sulla foto per ingrandirlo):
|
| sent on June 23, 2015 (19:11) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Quality at the highest level !!! wow! Qualità ai massimi livelli!!!  |
| sent on June 23, 2015 (19:17) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Very impressive ... Davvero notevole... |
| sent on June 23, 2015 (19:23) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Mei co.io.ni ... wow! Mei co.io.ni... |
| sent on June 23, 2015 (19:23) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
remarkable, truly remarkable. notevole, davvero notevole. |
| sent on June 23, 2015 (19:49) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
In HD it enters a world of glittering diamonds ...
Shooting fascinating! In HD si penetra in un mondo di bagliori diamantini...
Scatto affascinante ! |
| sent on June 23, 2015 (20:22) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I do not want to do the contrarian at all costs, but I seem to see the same "kneading" of the 7D. non voglio fare il bastian contrario a tutti i costi, ma mi sembra di vedere la stessa "impastatura" della 7D. |
| sent on June 23, 2015 (20:36) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Entertainment! wow! Spettacolo! |
| sent on June 23, 2015 (20:42) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I think the file is converted from raw, so I would say it's perfect. credo che il file sia convertito dal raw, quindi direi che sia perfetto. |
| sent on June 23, 2015 (20:50) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
It does not seem the appropriate topic to judge the resolution, does not lend itself to a judgment of the quality of the file. Non mi sembra il soggetto adatto a giudicare la risoluzione, non si presta ad un giudizio della qualità del file. |
user62173 | sent on June 23, 2015 (21:06) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Boh ... not capisco.wow!
I would say at first sight that can not be compared to the quality of the Nikon D800 36MP ....
then I do not know. Boh...non capisco.
Direi a prima vista che non è assolutamente paragonabile alla qualità dei 36MP della Nikon D800....
poi non so. |
| sent on June 23, 2015 (21:59) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I wish I had taken note of the names of all those who in recent years said they feared the time when the full frame sensors would have "too many pixels".
Many have passed off as connoisseurs of regret saying the 12Mpx the old 5D.
You 12mpx want from this photo? Ricampionatela, take a 2x2 binning, do what you want, then make a comparison by side by side with the old 5D and we explain, exactly, what you regret the old sensors.
The files take up too much space? Select lower resolution formats on-camera ;-) Vorrei aver preso nota dei nomi di tutti quelli che in questi anni hanno detto di temere l'epoca in cui i sensori full frame avrebbero avuto "troppi pixel".
In molti si sono spacciati per intenditori dicendo di rimpiangere i 12Mpx della 5D old.
Volete 12Mpx da questa foto? Ricampionatela, fate un binning 2x2, fate quello che volete, poi fate un contronto fianco a fianco con la 5D old e ci spiegate, di preciso, che cosa rimpiangete dei vecchi sensori.
I file occupano troppo spazio? Scegliete formati a risoluzioni inferiori on-camera  |
| sent on June 23, 2015 (22:27) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
In the coming days I will put more photos of test subjects with the best, but today I got the camera at night and I photographed what I had on hand :-) Nei prossimi giorni metterò altre foto di test con soggetti migliori, ma oggi ho ricevuto la fotocamera verso sera e ho fotografato quello che avevo a portata di mano :-) |
| sent on June 23, 2015 (22:38) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Hello Juza,
indicates f: 8 for this picture, it seems to me in front heavy focus ?! seems made to 2.8, back in focus while the front so blurred, these openings must have a quality of fire excelled. Ciao Juza,
indichi f:8 per questa foto, a me pare in pesante front focus?! sembra fatta a 2,8, retro a fuoco mentre la parte anteriore così sfocato, a queste aperture doveva avere un qualità di fuoco eccelso. |
| sent on June 23, 2015 (22:50) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
is taken in manual focus, I chose where to focus so there can be front or back focus, which are errors AF :-)
the depth of field is very limited because we are a magnification macro and the subject is very three-dimensional ... at this magnification even at f / 8, the depth of field is 2.3 millimeters. è scattata in manual focus, ho scelto io dove mettere a fuoco quindi non ci può essere front o back focus, che sono errori di AF :-)
la profondità di campo è limitatissima perchè siamo a ingrandimenti macro e il soggetto è molto tridimensionale...a questo ingrandimento anche a f/8 la profondità di campo è 2-3 millimetri. |
| sent on June 23, 2015 (23:11) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
You see that I do not do it ... thanks Macro Juza. Si vede che non faccio Macro è... grazie Juza. |
| sent on June 24, 2015 (8:36) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
not bad, not bad really wow! niente male, veramente niente male |
| sent on June 24, 2015 (8:37) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I see a little 'too much electronic noise to be a FF Io vedo un po' troppo rumore elettronico per essere una FF |
user57136 | sent on June 24, 2015 (9:58) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I would say very good Direi ottima |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
![[retina]](shared_files/layout/retina_badge.jpg){kind=icon}
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
50.3 MEGAPIXEL
Resize to fit window
