What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on June 04, 2015 (19:34) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Congratulations Mark,
large beautiful portrait! :-P
Hello, Paul Complimenti Marco,
gran bel ritratto!
Ciao, Paolo |
| sent on June 04, 2015 (20:11) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Beautiful 8-) 8-) Bella |
| sent on June 10, 2015 (16:34) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
thanks, Paul, glad you like it.
Thanks also to you Vittorio.
As I say above, I was interested in a comparison between "portrait of a kid in Langa township" and "portrait of a kid in Langa township - bis" (in this same gallery). Any comments?
Thank you, hello, Marco.
grazie, Paolo, contento che ti piaccia.
Grazie anche a te Vittorio.
Come dico sopra, mi interessava una comparativa fra "portrait of a kid in Langa township" e "portrait of a kid in Langa township - bis" (in questa stessa galleria). Any comments?
Grazie, ciao, Marco.
|
| sent on June 15, 2015 (21:58) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Oh yeah ... I remembered it commented ... In all honesty I prefer the first shot itself already excelled. The original was well contrasted dramatically in this too have softened tones. It looks just change the appearance of the face. Finally, I am not convinced toning. The best pure B / N. There may however be some slight aesthetic corrections and compositional ... So I think you understand that I liked the first version ... :-P I do not want ...
Hello !!! Oh si...Ricordavo di averla commentata...In tutta onestà preferisco il primo scatto già di per se eccelso. L'originale era drammaticamente ben contrastato, in questo hai ammorbidito troppo i toni. Sembra proprio cambi la fisionomia del viso. Infine non mi convince il viraggio. Meglio il puro B/N. Ci possono stare invece alcune correzioni estetiche e il leggero taglio compositivo...Insomma credo si capisca che mi piaceva la prima versione... Non me ne volere...
Ciao!!! |
| sent on June 16, 2015 (2:07) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thank you, Lorenzo, and this' the kind of comment I wanted. Your suggestions are in line with the position to which I was already 'settling. When can I produce a third version, so ... 'bored all even more', no joke, and 'I believe in repetition as a tool for improvement. Thank you very much again, hello, Marco. Grazie, Lorenzo, questo e' il tipo di commento che cercavo. I tuoi suggerimenti sono in linea con la posizione sulla quale mi stavo gia' assestando. Quando posso produco una terza versione, ... cosi' annoio tutti ancor di piu', no, scherzo, e' che credo nella ripetizione come strumento di miglioramento. Grazie tante di nuovo, ciao, Marco. |
| sent on August 24, 2016 (0:01) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
the photo is definitely beautiful, meanwhile congratulations!
Perhaps an idea might be to close a bit 'the diaphragm to give greater depth of field and give a glimpse of a little' more the person behind it, that sounds interesting ...
but it is only an idea, the picture is beautiful
ps I'd like to try the analog instead (without leaving the digital ...)
A greeting la foto è sicuramente bellissima, intanto complimenti!
forse un'idea poteva essere anche quella di chiudere un po' il diaframma per dare maggiore profondità di campo e far intravedere un po' di più il soggetto alle spalle, che sembra interessante...
ma è solo un'idea, la foto è stupenda
ps a me piacerebbe provare l'analogico invece (senza abbandonare il digitale...)
un saluto |
| sent on August 24, 2016 (9:54) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Hello Vale,
I agree with you on the diaphragm, the subject of background, my mother, though better implemented freely give added value to the image. In those moments and 'hard to optimal shooting, I entered the cabin perhaps for one minute, I did 3-4 shots in different positions.
For analog, I know different people photographing film, at all levels, some even with the optical bench. The yield of an optical bench and 'exceptional, certainly not go for all kinds and for all photographers. But an old Pentax 6x7 .... But I have doubts about the reasons to remain available on products photographing to 35 mm.
Thank you, hello, Mark.
Ciao Vale,
concordo con te sul diaframma, il soggetto di sfondo, la mamma, se meglio recepita donerebbe all'immagine un valore aggiunto. In quei momenti e' difficile ottimizzare lo scatto, sono entrato nella baracca forse per 1 minuto, ho fatto 3-4 scatti, in diverse posizioni.
Per l'analogico, conosco diversa gente che fotografa a pellicola, a tutti i livelli, alcuni anche con il banco ottico. La resa di un banco ottico e' eccezionale, certo non va per tutti i generi e per tutti i fotografi. Ma una vecchia Pentax 6x7 .... Invece nutro dubbi sulle motivazioni per rimanere sull'analogico fotografando a 35 mm.
Grazie, ciao, Marco.
|
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
![[retina]](shared_files/layout/retina_badge.jpg){kind=icon}
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
15.1 MEGAPIXEL
Resize to fit window
