What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on June 23, 2015 (11:12) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I side steps just can not seem to use them with 50 canon ... I would keep the 5d but in fact I miss the side. In fact I would like.
The focus of the subject is perfect, great shot. Regards, david Io i punti laterali proprio non riesco ad usarli col 50 canon... Vorrei tenere la 5d però i laterali appunto mi mancano. Anzi mi piacerebbero. La messa fuoco del soggetto è perfetta, ottimo scatto. Saluti, davide |
| sent on June 23, 2015 (12:38) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Hello David,
do not give away the 5D really! I now 6d and I am fine, but I guarantee that the images of 5d are really - to my taste - amazing.
50 which uses Canon 1.8 or 1.4 or 1.2?
I 50Art instead with the side of the 5d I use them a lot and with great satisfaction.
Thanks for the ride and appreciation, Riccardo Ciao Davide, non dare via la 5d davvero! Ho preso adesso la 6d e mi trovo benissimo, ma ti garantisco che le immagini della 5d sono davvero - a mio gusto - strepitose. Quale 50 Canon utilizzi 1.8 o 1.4 o 1.2? Io con il 50Art invece i laterali della 5d li uso davvero tanto e con grande soddisfazione. Grazie del passaggio e dell'apprezzamento, Riccardo |
| sent on June 23, 2015 (14:24) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thanks Richard, I use 50 1.4 and repeat the lateral points are unusable. As Sigma could be better? I have some difficulty even with 70-200.
The 6d looks really interesting for resistance to high ISO, but it is a bit 'little one physically (no offense)? Grazie Riccardo, uso il 50 1.4 e ripeto che i punti laterali sono inutilizzabili. Col Sigma potrebbe andare meglio? Ho qualche difficoltà anche col 70-200. La 6d sembra davvero interessante per la resistenza ad alti iso, ma non è un po' piccolina fisicamente (senza offesa)? |
| sent on June 23, 2015 (15:29) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
David certainly not talking about a one right ... but I must say that my side i use them ...
I am fine with 50A!
View 6d - 5d old coming from the first time you seem small. after you miss it and even, indeed, is the 5d to seem a brick ....
Both are great machines, each of his time - of course - but each really good (you're right, at high ISO the 6d is top) Certo Davide non parliamo di una 1 dx... però ti devo dire che la mia i laterali li usa... Col 50A mi trovo benissimo! Guarda la 6d - venendo dalla 5d old la prima ora ti sembra piccola. dopo non te ne accorgi nemmeno e, anzi, è la 5d a sembrarti un mattone.... Sono entrambe gran macchine, ognuna del suo tempo - ovviamente - ma ognuna davvero valida (hai ragione tu, agli alti iso la 6d è top) |
| sent on January 14, 2018 (23:35) | This comment has been translated
Spectacular |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |