What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 231000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on April 14, 2015 (19:52) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Test photos (no artistic pretensions, it's just a sample) taken with the Samsung S6, no processing, I loaded as it is output from the phone:-)
I suggest you download it at full resolution: www.juzaphoto.com/hr.php?t=1292703&r=43860&l=it Foto di test (nessuna pretesa artistica, è solo un sample) scattata col Samsung S6, nessuna elaborazione, l'ho caricata così come è uscita dal telefono :-)
Vi consiglio di scaricarla a piena risoluzione: www.juzaphoto.com/hr.php?t=1292703&r=43860&l=it |
user39791 | sent on April 14, 2015 (19:58) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Though! Però! |
| sent on April 14, 2015 (20:57) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
So much! Alla faccia! |
| sent on April 15, 2015 (12:56) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
To be taken at f / 1.8 does not seem at all bad !!! Per essere scattata ad f/1.8 non mi pare per nulla male!!! |
| sent on April 15, 2015 (13:18) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Not bad this S6 !!! :-) Non male questo S6!!! |
| sent on April 15, 2015 (13:21) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
A small clarification, the diaphragm is real f / 1.9, because at the time I put 1.8 1.9 is not available from the options ... you'll have to add:-) In any case the difference is minimal. Una piccola precisazione, il diaframma reale è f/1.9, ho messo 1.8 perchè al momento 1.9 non è disponibile tra le opzioni...lo dovrò aggiungere :-) in ogni caso la differenza è minima. |
| sent on May 02, 2015 (8:20) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
wow? Yesterday I was pleasantly surprised to detail del'iphone 6 and seeing the various reviews on the net it seems that the galaxy is even better. Anyway some cameras of smartphones reached a remarkable detail. wow? Ieri sono rimasto piacevolmente colpito del dettaglio del'iphone 6 e vedendo le varie recensioni in rete sembra che il galaxy sia anche meglio. Cmq certo le fotocamere degli smartphone hanno raggiunto un dettaglio notevolissimo. |
| sent on May 03, 2015 (10:12) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
The thing that continues to confound is the size of the sensor. The plan configuration with very large offers, how can these tiny pair sensor / optics, offer so Tando also in terms of depth etc ...? La cosa che mi continua a confondere é la dimensione del sensore. La planaritá con dimensioni grandi offre molto, come possono questi microscopici accoppiamenti sensore/ottica, offrire cosí tando anche in termini di profonditá ecc...? |
| sent on May 03, 2015 (15:10) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
“ how can these tiny pair sensor / optics, offer so Tando also in terms of depth etc ...? „
the more the sensor is small, the more increases the depth of field ... a diaphragm f / 1.9 on a sensor as small as dell'S6 gives about the same depth of field of an f / 8 of fullframe. " come possono questi microscopici accoppiamenti sensore/ottica, offrire cosí tando anche in termini di profonditá ecc...? "
più il sensore è piccolo, più aumenta la profondità di campo... un diaframma f/1.9 su un sensore piccolo come quello dell'S6 dà pressapoco la stessa profondità di campo di un f/8 su fullframe. |
| sent on May 04, 2015 (23:57) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Sorry, I was referring to the depth and perspective of what was called "plan configuration" on film.
I find it amazing that you can get from tiny sizes! It will be a matter of proportions between the sensor and optics!? ... But it works! Scusa, mi riferivo alla profonditá prospettica e di quella che si chiamava "planaritá" sulla pellicola.
Trovo incredibile che si possa ottenere da formati minuscoli! Sará un fatto di proporzioni tra sensore e ottica!?...comunque funziona! |
| sent on May 25, 2015 (23:43) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
It is Samsung's power Sta Samsung è una potenza |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
![[retina]](shared_files/layout/retina_badge.jpg){kind=icon}
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
15.9 MEGAPIXEL
Resize to fit window
