What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on January 13, 2015 (20:35) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
nice and sharp ... bella e nitida... |
| sent on January 14, 2015 (7:46) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thanks Gaetano Grazie Gaetano |
| sent on January 15, 2015 (8:08) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Excellent Ottima |
| sent on January 15, 2015 (16:36) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thanks Mark Grazie Marco |
| sent on January 20, 2015 (14:06) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
do not miss a shot with the 400 5.6 ...
beautiful !!! I sensors canon like much more of nikon ... I find them more real. Softer but no less incisi..diciamo the right at least to me. non si sbaglia un colpo con il 400 5,6...
bella!!! a me i sensori canon piacciono molto di piu dei nikon...li trovo più reali. Più morbidi ma non meno incisi..diciamo il giusto almeno per me. |
| sent on January 20, 2015 (14:47) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Very nice Franco, I have to make some notes: I believe you have lightened too 's eye, you notice some smudges on the form that you used to clean the background (for example on' wing). The contrast material on the subject has created many artifacts, at least seeing the HD files, values ??that you used? Excuse my frankness, you are a good photographer, you must (of course:-D) improve the PP;-)
Ciaoo;-) Molto bella Franco, devo farti degli appunti: a mio avviso hai schiarito troppo l' occhio, si notano alcune sbavature nella maschera che hai usato per pulire lo sfondo ( ad esempio sull' ala ). La mdc sul soggetto ha creato molti artefatti, almeno vedendo il file HD, che valori hai usato? Scusa la franchezza, sei un bravo fotografo, devi ( per forza  ) migliorare nella PP 
Ciaoo |
| sent on January 20, 2015 (18:50) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
For the PP agree with Roberto ... with regard to the eye, in cases like this, where it is very dark and not well lit, I would avoid trying to correct it because the final effect is likely always to be a little 'fake ... also because I'm not very good in PP, and in fact I avoid even clean / blur backgrounds for fear of trouble:-D. Per la PP sono d'accordo con Roberto...per quanto riguarda l'occhio, in casi come questo, in cui è molto scuro e non ben illuminato, io eviterei di provare a correggerlo perché l'effetto finale rischia sempre di essere un po' finto...anche perchè io non sono molto bravo in PP, ed infatti evito anche di pulire/sfocare gli sfondi per paura di fare casini . |
| sent on January 21, 2015 (8:03) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Hello Rob, the raw is developed on DDP vers. 4 l 'mdc was 7,3,4. After PS CS6 I reduced the noise in the background by applying a mask to not apply it at the subject. It is true the 'eye is not the best but it was too dark and I did not like.
Thanks for the advice, always be free, even if you can give me some advice more.
Marco 400 5.6 for me is a big goal, but the biggest difference I 've noticed on the camera body even if not quite correct to compare the D7000 with 7DmkII.
Finally thanks to Roberto De Siena Ciao Rob, il raw è sviluppato su DDP vers. 4 l' mdc era 7,3,4. Dopo con PS CS6 ho ridotto il rumore sullo sfondo applicando una maschera per non applicarlo sul soggetto. Si è vero l' occhio non è il massimo ma era troppo scuro e non mi piaceva.
Grazie dei consigli, sii sempre franco, anzi se puoi dammi qualche dritta in più.
Marco il 400 5,6 per me è un grande obiettivo ma la differenza maggiore l' ho notata sul corpo macchina anche se non è proprio corretto paragonare la D7000 con la 7DmkII.
Per finire grazie anche Roberto De Siena |
| sent on January 21, 2015 (15:32) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I send you a mp Frank;-) Ti mando un mp Frank |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
![[retina]](shared_files/layout/retina_badge.jpg){kind=icon}
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
5.6 MEGAPIXEL
Resize to fit window
