What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on November 03, 2014 (21:57) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
A photo of the test (with no artistic pretensions, just to test the camera!)
Here there was really very little light: to give an idea of ??how dark it was, if I had taken at ISO 100 I would have to use a shutter speed of 16 "!
Obviously it is not perfect, but we're talking about a hundred thousand ISO! :-) Una foto di test (senza pretese artistiche,è solo per provare la fotocamera!)
Qui c'era veramente pochissima luce: per dare l'idea di quanto fosse buio, se avessi scattato a 100 ISO avrei dovuto utilizzare un tempo di scatto di 16"!
Ovviamente non è perfetta, ma stiamo parlando di centomila ISO! :-) |
| sent on November 03, 2014 (23:08) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
O_0 ' O_0' |
| sent on November 04, 2014 (0:08) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
but I'm wondering, what is the threshold beyond which the ISO will begin to see the noise with this A7S?
or rather the max ISO of where I have not noise? ma mi sto chiedendo, qual'è la soglia degli iso oltre alla quale si comincia a intravedere il rumore con questa a7s?
o meglio dire il max degli iso dove ancora non ho del rumore? |
| sent on November 04, 2014 (9:23) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Impressive results (especially this one)! By chance have you tried to reduce the noise in PP? Risultati impressionanti (sopratutto questo) ! Per caso hai provato a ridurre il rumore in PP ? |
| sent on November 04, 2014 (11:01) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
wow, impressive ... wow, impressiona... |
| sent on November 05, 2014 (12:12) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Full-frame noise can be seen, moreover, miseriaccia, we talk about ISO 102400 !!! but in terms of "quality of sound", well that is to let me thrilled! zero chroma (which I guess you'll have eliminated) and a uniform grain, mushy, beautiful to look at, it seems almost added volutamene post! gives me the chills a pieno formato il rumore si vede, del resto, miseriaccia, parliamo di 102400 ISO!!! ma in termini di "qualità del rumore", beh è quella a lasciarmi basito! zero crominanza (che immagino avrai eliminato tu) e una grana uniforme, pastosa, bellissima da guardare, sembra quasi aggiunta volutamene in post! a me dà i brividi |
| sent on November 05, 2014 (12:16) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
wow, practically glows in the dark caspita, praticamente illumina il buio |
| sent on November 05, 2014 (21:43) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
“ If you have tried to reduce the noise in PP? „
Yes, I applied the noise reduction in Camera RAW. " Per caso hai provato a ridurre il rumore in PP ? "
Si, ho applicato la riduzione rumore con Camera RAW. |
| sent on November 06, 2014 (12:23) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
“ Yes, I have applied the noise reduction in Camera Raw. „
well then I would like to see the result with the alpha5100 but forcing the image to the same pixel resolution (ie 12MP). In this way you understand the real difference between the two sensors! " Si, ho applicato la riduzione rumore con Camera RAW."
beh allora vorrei vedere il risultato con l'alpha5100 ma forzando l'immagine alla stessa risoluzione di pixels (cioè 12Mp). In questo modo si capirebbe la reale differenza tra i due sensori ! |
| sent on January 31, 2015 (18:44) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
100,000 ISO ... thin surreptitious advertising !!! 100.000 ISO... sottile pubblicità occulta!!! |
| sent on April 15, 2015 (7:27)
ISO 102400?!!! |
user92328 | sent on May 21, 2016 (18:05) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Excuse me Juza, for clarity's sake, but how come I see ISO 64000 in the shooting data, and then there are ISO 102400 in the description and the pictures ... ?? Is he that ISO 102400 extension is not supported in the program for the inclusion of shooting data ..? thank you right now, Hello ... Scusami Juza, per amor di chiarezza, ma come mai vedo un 64000 ISO nei dati di scatto, mentre poi ci sono ISO 102400 nella descrizione e sulla foto...?? sarà mica che l'estensione ISO 102400 non è supportata nel programma per l'inserimento dati di scatto..? ringrazio sin da subito, Ciao... |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
![[retina]](shared_files/layout/retina_badge.jpg){kind=icon}
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
12.0 MEGAPIXEL
Resize to fit window
