What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 243000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on February 04, 2014 (21:54) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
beautiful capture bella cattura |
| sent on February 04, 2014 (21:54) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
really nice compliments veramente bella complimenti |
| sent on February 04, 2014 (22:02) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Beautiful cattura.Ciao Bella cattura.Ciao |
| sent on February 04, 2014 (22:51) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Very nice, great capture Molto bella, ottima la cattura |
| sent on February 04, 2014 (23:34) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
nice, very good copy. bella, ottimo esemplare. |
| sent on February 04, 2014 (23:41) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
very nice molto bella |
| sent on February 05, 2014 (8:50) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Free or in an aviary? Libero o in una voliera? |
| sent on February 05, 2014 (9:00) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
A beautiful shot. Germany??? Greetings Robertino Un bellissimo scatto. Germania????? Un saluto Robertino |
| sent on February 05, 2014 (9:45) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Beautiful and well-shoot It would not appear in the aviary Greetings Franco 8-) Bella e ben ripresa Non sembrerebbe in voliera Un saluto Franco |
| sent on February 05, 2014 (9:45) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
If freedom is a great shot! If aviary just beautiful ;-) Se in libertà è un grandissimo scatto ! Se in voliera solo bello |
| sent on February 05, 2014 (10:36) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
where were you? with a 200mm definitely the owl was not in lbertà dov'eri? con un 200mm sicuramente l'allocco non era in lbertà |
| sent on February 05, 2014 (11:20) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Quoto Fabrizio Quoto Fabrizio |
| sent on February 05, 2014 (11:51)
Very cute owl, good shot. Francis |
| sent on February 05, 2014 (12:04) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
obviously convict:-D ovviamente galeotto |
| sent on February 05, 2014 (12:37) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I do not believe that a little effort in circulating nowadays ... "a forest" in broad daylight and you come across a Ural Owl posed a couple of meters (or maybe less) from the ground, absolutely uncovered (as d 'Anyway, it is typical for a night in daylight hours!!) and has all the time to place the tripod, etc., etc., ... careless with the subject that I miss him ..... look at a few meters (70-200mm!) away! Once, many, but many years ago, I thought the witch and the flying donkeys ..... Once! Not any more! Now on the other hand make me angry comments "very nice" and "good catch" that bear witness once more the absolute non-existent degree of naturalistic culture in our country. I was hard? Well, I really wanted to be!! Faccio non poca fatica a credere che uno si aggiri in ..."un bosco" in pieno giorno e si imbatta in un Allocco degli Urali posato ad un paio di metri (o forse meno!) dal suolo, assolutamente allo scoperto (come d'altronde è tipico per un notturno nelle ore diurne !!!!) e trovi tutto il tempo per piazzare cavalletto, ecc, ecc,... con il soggetto incurante che manco lo guarda.....a pochi metri (70-200mm !!!) di distanza! Una volta, tanti, ma tanti anni fa, credevo alla befana e agli asini che volano..... Una volta!!! Ora non più ! Ora in compenso mi fanno incazzare i commenti di "molto bella" ed "ottima cattura" che, testimoniano una volta di più l'assoluto inesistente grado di cultura naturalistica nel nostro Paese. Sono stato duro ? Beh, volevo assolutamente esserlo !!!!! |
| sent on February 05, 2014 (12:53) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Gorki you're absolutely right, but Daltro hand we are not a forum for wildlife photography but where is given an opinion, a judgment on the shoot. It 'also true that regularly states that you should indicate whether the shooting was carried out in captivity or not. Expect, therefore, lumens from Ste59. Greetings Franco Gorki hai perfettamente ragione, ma daltro canto non siamo in un forum di naturalistica ma di fotografia dove viene dato un parere, un giudizio sullo scatto. E' anche vero che il regolamente precisa che si debba indicare se lo scatto è stato effettuato in cattività o meno. Attendiamo, quindi, lumi da Ste59. Un saluto Franco |
| sent on February 05, 2014 (13:32) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Beyond giuduzi technicians, who do not read and that should be the first assessments to give a forum for amateur photographers, quoto 100% post Gorky and add that for honesty towards nature photography of the many fans who invest time , effort and study the behavior of the animals they intend to photograph, it is unacceptable that it is clarified that the photo has been carried out under controlled conditions, this does not take away anything from the beauty of the image and avoid irreparable damages that are caused by those unfamiliar with the delicacy of natural ecosystems. I remember that photography, like other sectors, requires compliance with a code of ethics. Al di là di giuduzi tecnici, che non leggo e che dovrebbero essere in primis le valutazioni da dare in un forum di fotoamatori, quoto al 100% il post di Gorki e aggiungo che per onestà nei confronti dei tanti appassionati di fotografia naturalistica che investono tempo, fatica e studio sul comportamento degli animali che intendono fotografare, è inammissibile che non si sottolinei che la foto è stata eseguita in condizioni controllate, questo non toglierebbe nulla alla bellezza dell'immagine ed eviterebbe che venissero causati danni irreparabili da chi non conosce la delicatezza degli ecosistemi naturali. Ricordo che la fotografia, al pari di altri settori, richiede il rispetto di un codice deontologico. |
| sent on February 05, 2014 (13:59) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
And 'maybe made at the Bayerischer Wald? In all honesty, should be explained, then everyone always does as he wants ... ;-) E' forse fatta al Bayerischer Wald? Per onestà andrebbe spiegato, poi ognuno fa sempre come vuole... |
| sent on February 05, 2014 (16:10) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
After a series of positive comments, I allowed myself first to raise doubts about the situation in which you took the photo because I thought I recognize the place, in fact the aviary at the Bayerischer Wald. But maybe I'm wrong and I dispelling the author. But, while sharing the views expressed by Gorki and other users, but now I would like to comment only the technical quality of the photograph. The composition is well balanced, but the detail is quite poor (I do not know whether to blame the lens or a focus inaccurate or shake-). Also look a bit 'too much noise in the background. Hello Dopo una serie di commenti positivi, mi sono permesso per primo di sollevare dei dubbi sulla situazione in cui è stata scattata la foto perché credevo di riconoscere il posto, appunto la voliera del Bayerischer Wald. Ma forse mi sbaglio e l'autore mi smentirà. Ma, pur condividendo le opinioni espresse da Gorki e da altri utenti, vorrei tuttavia ora commentare solo la qualità tecnica della fotografia. La composizione è ben bilanciata, ma il dettaglio è alquanto scarso (non so se per colpa dell'ottica o di una messa a fuoco imprecisa o di micromosso). Inoltre osservo un po' troppo rumore sullo sfondo. Ciao |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |