What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 251000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on May 27, 2024 (22:35) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Nice timing ! maybe as a title it was good Op-là !
Bel tempismo ! forse come titolo andava bene Op-là !
|
| sent on May 27, 2024 (22:53) | This comment has been translated
 |
| sent on May 27, 2024 (23:26) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Beautiful... What appears from the bottom of the machine on the left side? bellissima... cosa compare dal fondo della macchina dal lato sinistro ? |
| sent on May 27, 2024 (23:45) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
It was probably damaged and was losing a piece... tomorrow I'll check if I have any more pics ; ) Probabilmente era danneggiata e stava perdendo un pezzo...domani controllo se ho altre foto ; ) |
| sent on May 28, 2024 (13:48) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Outstanding shot for captured moment and panning, congratulations. Scatto eccezionale per momento colto e panning, complimenti. |
| sent on November 30, 2024 (8:16) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
How did you find yourself with this 200mm paired with the Om-1? Does forced marriage work well? Come ti sei trovato con questo 200mm in accoppiata con la Om-1? Funziona bene il matrimonio forzato? |
| sent on November 30, 2024 (9:52) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Apart from the stabilization (Dual Is not compatible, so blurred below 1/50) it works great ... autofocus even more precise than the 300 Pro and the 150-400... Stratospheric image quality and eye-catching blur...
but I had it "reviewed" directly by Fowa /LTR ... because it didn't work well at first.. he did not communicate ...
So it's a bit of a lottery ..
If you take a NON-Fowa version, therefore without Fowa warranty, you will have to pay everything at your own expense, for any damage or intervention or calibration ... The warranty of the RCE chain is also worth nothing ...
If necessary, contact serious dealers for second-hand (FotoOrlando, Fotolandia, fotoColombo, etc.) A parte per la stabilizzazione ( Dual Is non compatibile, quindi mosso sotto a 1/50 ) funziona alla grande ... autofocus più preciso addirittura del 300 Pro e del 150-400... Qualità di immagine stratosferica e sfocato accattivante...
io però l'ho fatto "revisionare" direttamente da Fowa /LTR ... perché all'inizio non funzionava bene ..non comunicava ...
Quindi è un po' un terno al lotto ..
Se lo prendi nuovo NON Fowa o usato,quindi senza garanzia Fowa , dovrai pagare tutto a tue spese ,per qualsiasi danno o intervento o taratura ... Anche la garanzia della catena RCE non vale niente ...
Rivolgiti eventualmente a rivenditori seri per l'usato( FotoOrlando Fotolandia fotoColombo ecc.... ) |
| sent on November 30, 2024 (11:32) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Ah, you surprised me, AF better than the 300...
I'm thinking about pure collecting, I no longer do photo hunting or sporting events and therefore I wouldn't need it, but I'd like the idea of a telephoto to complete the kit. The Oly zooms are too bulky and the performance is not what I would like, apart from the short-toed but we are overbudget.
The 300 is also quite big for me, while this 200mm is starting to tease me. I have to think if not being able to shoot < 1/50" is a problem, but I don't think so.
Thanks again ;-) Ah, mi hai spiazzato, AF migliore del 300...
Sto facendo dei ragionamenti di puro collezionismo, non faccio più caccia fotografica né eventi sportivi e quindi non mi servirebbe, ma mi piacerebbe l'idea di un tele per completare il corredo. Gli zoom Oly sono troppo ingombranti e la resa non è quella che vorrei, a parte per il biancone ma siamo overbudget.
Il 300 anche è abbastanza grosso per me, mentre questo 200mm comincia a stuzzicarmi. Devo pensare se non poter scattare < 1/50" sia un problema, ma non credo.
Grazie ancora  |
| sent on November 30, 2024 (12:39) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
“ The Oly zooms are too bulky and the performance is not what I would like „
This is still quite large and bulky, slightly less than the 300 Pro but clearly more than the 40-150.
The optical quality is on par with the 300 Pro maybe something better.
The fact that it is not compatible with double IS and with the 25/50 fps of the Om1 can be limiting.
I think it's much more enjoyable on the G9II
It's also discontinued (it seems... with Panasonic you don't understand anything) so spare parts and assistance could become a problem (it's already complicated).
It is one of the most beautiful and important lenses of the micro 4/3 system... as usual OMsystem and Panasonic also do everything to hurt themselves .. in this case cutting it from production :-o
" Gli zoom Oly sono troppo ingombranti e la resa non è quella che vorrei"
Questo è comunque abbastanza grosso e ingombrante, leggermente meno del 300 Pro ma nettamente più del 40-150.
La qualità ottica è pari al 300 Pro forse qualcosa meglio.
Il fatto che non sia compatibile con doppio Is e con i 25/50 fps della Om1 può essere limitante.
Penso che sia molto più godibile sulla G9II
È anche uscito di produzione ( pare... con Panasonic non si capisce niente) quindi pezzi di ricambio e assistenza potrebbero diventare un problema ( già adesso è complicato)..
È uno degli obiettivi più belli e importanti del sistema micro 4/3 ...come al solito OMsystem e Panasonic pure fanno di tutto per farsi male da soli ..in questo caso tagliandolo dalla produzione 
|
| sent on November 30, 2024 (13:42) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
In fact, quite incomprehensible to put it out of production. There is no alternative in the M4/3 world.
I have well seen the dimensions, among the various supertele mentioned it still remains the one with the most acceptable dimensions for me.
In effetti, abbastanza incomprensibile metterlo fuori produzione. non c'è un'alternativa nel mondo m4/3.
Ho ben visto le dimensioni, tra i vari supertele citati rimane comunque quello con le dimensioni più accettabili per me.
|
| sent on January 25, 2025 (19:32) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
you are always incredible ! sei sempre incredibile ! |
| sent on January 25, 2025 (21:33) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Ahahah thanks Ahahah grazie |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
![[retina]](shared_files/layout/retina_badge.jpg){kind=icon}
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
16.5 MEGAPIXEL
Resize to fit window
