JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here
You can buy an usage license for this photo. For info and prices contact Alexandar Polimanti at the e-mail alexandarpolimanti@gmail.com ; specify the title of the photo that you want and the usage that you request.
Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 251000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
sent on January 20, 2022 (14:51) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Certainly it is not easy to obtain excellent results freehand, a point of support would undoubtedly be useful. Also the parallelism would help to get a better sharpness, in this case it seems to me that I was slightly higher than the subject, so with the camera slightly tilted. A diaphragm so closed can lead you to have diffraction with a further loss of sharpness. Personally I think that an f11 would have been enough to have a good pdc on the butterfly, this would have led to using a faster time which freehand always if possible is preferable, even if the optics used has a lot of stabilizer. Certamente non è facile ottenere a mano libera ottimi risultati, un punto d'appoggio sarebbe indubbiamente utile. Anche il parallelismo aiuterebbe ad ottenere una migliore nitidezza, in questo caso mi sembra fossi leggermente più elevato rispetto al soggetto, quindi con la fotocamera leggermente inclinata. Un diaframma così chiuso può portarti ad avere della diffrazione con una perdita ulteriore della nitidezza. Personalmente penso che un f11 sarebbe stato sufficiente per avere una buona pdc sulla farfalla, questo avrebbe portato ad utilizzare un tempo più veloce il quale a mano libera sempre se possibile è preferibile, anche se l'ottica usata ha tanto di stabilizzatore.
sent on January 20, 2022 (16:48) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
So far I have always done freehand all the macro and nature photography, I still have to find the right measure actually and try with tripod even if I lose in "stealth" and speed of execution! I will try as advice to keep the diaphragm more open and to put myself perhaps more in line with the subject! Thanks for the advice..! I also add that perhaps the sigma optics in my possession is calibrated a little badly and suffers from fb focus, closing the diaphragm in an exaggerated way seems to help in general! It makes sense as what? Finora ho fatto sempre a mano libera tutta la fotografia macro e naturalistica, devo ancora trovare la giusta misura effettivamente e provare con treppiede anche se perdo in "furtività" e rapidità di esecuzione! Proverò come consigli a tenere il diaframma più aperto e a mettermi magari più in linea con il soggetto! Grazie dei consigli..! Aggiungo anche che forse l'ottica sigma in mio possesso è tarata un po male e soffre di fb focus, chiudere il diaframma in maniera esagerata sembra aiutare in genere! Ha senso come cosa?
![[retina]](shared_files/layout/retina_badge.jpg){kind=icon}
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
24.0 MEGAPIXEL
Resize to fit window
