JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here
Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 252000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
sent on April 03, 2021 (18:07) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Functional shooting point. Compositive level it was preferable to slender the shafts to include a few tips then using a wider-angle or backward focal point. T counter unnatural blue dominants over shaded areas. (imho) Ciao, Lauro Punto di ripresa funzionale. A livello compositivo era preferibile slanciare gli alberi includendo qualche punta quindi usando una focale più grandangolare o arretrando. Da contrastare le dominanti blu innaturali sulle zone in ombra. (imho) Ciao, Lauro
sent on April 06, 2021 (11:45) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Hi Elleemme, in this case I could not back down in that spotero on a raised point and back I lost my sight. I would have to mount the 16-35 f4 or 50 mm stm to keep the tips of the trees. On the blue dominants maybe you're right, I should take them away a little or desaturate the bluo by changing the balance of white Ciao Elleemme,in quesato caso non potevo arretrare in quel puntoero su un punto rialzato e arretrando perdevo la vista.mi piaceva la linea del torrente.Avrei dovuto montare il 16-35 f4 o il 50 mm stm per far stare le punte degli alberi.Sull dominanti blu forse hai ragione,dovrei tirarle via un po o desaturando il bluo cambiando il bilanciamneto del bianco
sent on April 06, 2021 (13:25) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
In those open environments we say that the most appropriate optics could be the new tamron 35-150mm vc or one of the 24-105mm canon. In urban environments the 16-35mm is perfect. 8-) (imho). In quei ambienti aperti diciamo che l'ottica più consona potrebbe essere il nuovo tamron 35-150mm vc oppure uno dei 24-105mm canon. Negli ambienti urbani è perfetto il 16-35mm . Un particolare intrigante è che la serie canon f.4 16-35mm, i vari 24-105mm e il tamron 35-150 f/2.8-4 hanno tutti lo stesso diamentro di portafiltri da 77mm. Il 35-150mm potrebbe a questo punto sostituire un 70-200mm evitando di aggiungere al corredo una 4a ottica (imho).
sent on April 06, 2021 (15:54) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
eh I will evaluate,also because I am thinking of switching to mirrorless,and I think they took a modern 24-105.here I was with wife and daughter 7 months behind,changing optics walking sometimes became difficult :-) eh valuterò,anche perchè sto pensando di passar a mirrorless,e penso prendero un 24-105 moderno.qua ero con moglie e figlia di 7 mesi dietro,cambiare ottica camminando a volte diventava difficile
![[retina]](shared_files/layout/retina_badge.jpg){kind=icon}
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
11.2 MEGAPIXEL
Resize to fit window
(imho). 