RCE Foto

(i) On JuzaPhoto, please disable adblockers (let's see why!)






Login LogoutJoin JuzaPhoto!
JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.


OK, I confirm


You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept CookiesCustomizeRefuse Cookies


  1. Galleries
  2. »
  3. Travel Reportage
  4. » The medina of Marrakech

 
The medina of Marrakech...

Marrakech

View gallery (15 photos)

The medina of Marrakech sent on August 26, 2020 (13:52) by Tommybatista. 3 comments, 78 views. [retina]

at 18mm, 1/60 f/22.0, ISO 100, hand held.




View High Resolution 17.9 MP  

1 person like it: Zolikron


What do you think about this photo?


Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?


You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 253000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.




avatarmoderator
sent on August 26, 2020 (20:47) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Good colors and detail.
It was preferable to backtrack to reduce the strong drooping lines and to give breathing space to the location.
Syy you feel the need for a super-enlargement 10-18/20mm you could one day think of a multipurpose optics as a 17-70mm sigma os macro or 15-85mm canon is ... 1 or 3 mm more in the lower part can make a difference by avoiding changes of optics and sensor dirt as on this occasion ;-)
(imho)
Hello, Lauro

avatarjunior
sent on August 27, 2020 (9:34) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Hello Lauro, thank you very much for the advice that are always welcome! It must also be said that in that circumstance I was still little "navigated" and I corrected almost nothing in PP, for the targets instead currently I also have a 24 mm that could have come in really very useful in that context... thank you so much for the compliments! ;-)

avatarmoderator
sent on August 27, 2020 (11:08) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Ni, you shot at 18mm and you were tight, imagining yourself with a 24mm. 8-)
With a 24mm you can make street or natural landscapes (very difficult urban).
.. that's why I usually recommend a multifaceted zoom and different from the classic optical kit with a few mm gnawed in the lower part and taking into account that in some environments less optical changes we have better is (dust)
Last note: difphering.... if we close in an exaggerated way it presents itself, it re-asserts the poor detail.
f.8 classic value , f.9-f13 are the maximum values for this optics ;-)
Always (imho)
Lauro




Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

Some comments may have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator.  Microsoft Translator



 ^

JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.

Mobile Version - juza.ea@gmail.com - Terms of use and Privacy - Cookie Preferences - P. IVA 01501900334 - REA 167997- PEC juzaphoto@pec.it

May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me