RCE Foto

(i) On JuzaPhoto, please disable adblockers (let's see why!)






Login LogoutJoin JuzaPhoto!
JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.


OK, I confirm


You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept CookiesCustomizeRefuse Cookies


  1. Galleries
  2. »
  3. Landscape (wilderness)
  4. » Etretat - Alabaster Coast

 
Etretat - Alabaster Coast...

Francia '17

View gallery (3 photos)

Etretat - Alabaster Coast sent on August 17, 2017 (21:05) by Rr90. 5 comments, 703 views. [retina]

1/50 f/20.0, ISO 100,




View High Resolution 24.0 MP  



What do you think about this photo?


Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?


You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 256000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.




avatarsenior
sent on August 18, 2017 (0:50) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Hi Riccardo, in this case, the sensor has some difficulty covering the entire dynamic range of the scene, so the cliff is exposed well while the brighter sky is overexposed and perhaps in some areas burned.
The shooting point I like, while focusing on the distortion of the lens (to be easily resolved in the post) that makes the edge slightly curve the horizon.

avatarjunior
sent on August 18, 2017 (14:56) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Burning from what do you see it? I have already worked in the post, I do not know how to resolve the distortion that, honestly, I do not know what you see xDDDDDDDD. Illuminami * _ *
How obviously are the over-exposed sky issues?
You made me think of one thing: the range of colors in the car I have the choice between sRBG and adobe RBG: what's change and what to choose? It is factory set the first one.

Concluding: Is the diaphragm too closed?

avatarjunior
sent on August 18, 2017 (14:56) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Burning from what do you see it? I have already worked in the post, I do not know how to resolve the distortion that, honestly, I do not know what you see xDDDDDDDD. Illuminami * _ *
How obviously are the over-exposed sky issues?
You made me think of one thing: the range of colors in the car I have the choice between sRBG and adobe RBG: what's change and what to choose? It is factory set the first one.

Concluding: Is the diaphragm too closed?

avatarsenior
sent on August 18, 2017 (19:42)


This comment is too long to be automatically translated, so it will be shown in its original language (Italian)  

Click here to translate the comment in English [en]


Per essere certi della bruciatura basta vedere l'istogramma (questo è visibile già in macchina, appena scattata la foto, sullo schermo puoi vedere l'immagine e il corispettivo istogramma - oppure quando apri la foto con un programma di post, io uso camera raw) , se l'istogramma tocca il margine destro vuol dire che alcuni pixel sono bruciati.
Ogni obiettivo ha la sua deformazione, più o meno accentuata, di solito (con camera raw penso che sia simile anche con gli programmi) basta spuntare una casella per correggerlo (la vedo dalla linea dell'orizzonte che verso il margine destro incomincia a curvarsi.
Su srgb e rgb mi metti in difficoltà, penso sia meglio scattare in srgb, il problema, mi sembra, cmq che avvenga quando l'impostazione tra fotocamera computer ed eventualmente stampante sia diversa.
F20 sicuramente è un diaframma chiuso e quindi rischi la diffrazione, però dipende sempre da che obiettivo hai usato e da quanto sia denso il sensore.
Ad esempio io so che il mio nikon 18-105 da il suo "meglio" tra f8 e f11.
Di solito nessun obiettivo è performante alla sua apertura massima e hanno la miglior qualità chiusi di 1-2 stop.





avatarjunior
sent on August 19, 2017 (1:03) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Is the diffraction seen? He married how much I had to study xD


RCE Foto

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

Some comments may have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator.  Microsoft Translator



 ^

JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.

Mobile Version - juza.ea@gmail.com - Terms of use and Privacy - Cookie Preferences - P. IVA 01501900334 - REA 167997- PEC juzaphoto@pec.it

May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me