What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on December 08, 2016 (20:48) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
He is a great cool and you have definitely created a masterpiece! Lui è un gran figo e tu hai decisamente creato un capolavoro! |
| sent on December 08, 2016 (21:08) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Ahahhaah you have made the idea ... thanks a lot from both of them ..
Ciauzzz, Pier. Ahahhaah hai reso l idea...grazie mille da parte di entrambi.. Ciauzzz, Pier. |
| sent on December 08, 2016 (21:23) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
The idea of ??a "Dark Portrait" is very interesting and a weapon in your most beautiful portraits. In this photo, however, the enlightened eye is out of focus. As focus, the picture similar you posted on November 17 is definitely better. About "Dark" it does not much back the specular reflection on his forehead and nose does not have the same intensity of the reflection on the hair and piercing. This is physically impossible, and makes the less credible image, unless it had covered the cocoa skin.
L'idea di un "Dark Portrait" è molto interessante e un'arma in più per i tuoi bellissimi ritratti. In questa foto però, l'occhio illuminato è fuori fuoco. Come messa a fuoco, la foto analoga che hai postato il 17 novembre è decisamente meglio. Circa il "Dark" non mi tornano tanto i riflessi speculari sulla fronte e sul naso: non hanno la stessa intensità dei riflessi sui capelli e sul piercing. Questo fisicamente è impossibile e rende l'immagine meno credibile, a meno che il soggetto non si fosse coperto la pelle di cacao o fondotinta, cosa che escluderei considerati i pori ben visibili. |
| sent on December 08, 2016 (21:52) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Hello Motofoto, the eye and 'out of focus deliberately (I know you are thinking "what's the point") I have deliberately focused at 1.4 on the tip of the nose / percing, I wanted to keep the look into the background, (my usual experiments) I used a simple little three-quarter front bulb and brushed the black skin to make it more 'dark, this and' the result, no cocoa or similar things :-P :-P
The fact that we speak a bit I'm glad ....
Thank you and good evening, Pier Ciao Motofoto, l occhio e' fuori fuoco volutamente (so che starai pensando" che senso ha " ) ho volutamente messo a fuoco a 1.4 sulla punta del naso/percing, volevo tenere lo sguardo in secondo piano, ( soliti miei esperimenti ) ho utilizzato una semplice lampadina frontale leggermente a tre quarti e pennellato la pelle di nero per renderla piu' dark, questo e' il risultato, niente cacao o robe simili Il fatto che se ne parli un po mi fa piacere.... Grazie e buona serata,Pier |
| sent on December 08, 2016 (22:04) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Then it all comes back again ;-) Thanks for the explanation, and good evening to you too. Allora tutto torna di nuovo Grazie per la spiegazione e buona serata anche a te. |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |