Barcarello and Carini

JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.

OK, I confirm

You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept Cookies

Customize

Refuse Cookies

Galleries
Landscape (wilderness)

13.9 MEGAPIXEL

Resize to fit window

Palermo... la mia città View gallery (1 photos)

Barcarello and Carini sent on August 06, 2012 (15:33) by Gianfra311. 12 comments, 869 views.

at 17mm, 30 sec f/22.0, ISO 100, tripod. Riserva Isola delle Femmine, Italy.

View High Resolution 13.9 MP

4 persons like it: Francosan69, Johnjz, Michela Checchetto, Uccio

What do you think about this photo?

Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?

You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 251000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.

Johnjz

sent on August 06, 2012 (16:12) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Light "delicate"!

Gianfra311

sent on August 06, 2012 (16:50) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

I left intact the natural color of the image as it was captured by the lens, in that moment of history that is the end of the sunset and the lighting of the sky and the surrounding landscape that continues to keep the warm colors but now nearing the evening ...

user14758

sent on August 06, 2012 (17:56) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Beautiful photos .. I must say that the light in the foreground on the beach seems too strong, too full. adds a touch of fantasy, but also can create a contrast a bit too much for the eye ... are views XD photo is very subjective .. Your really nice :) A f / 22 does not click anything, the image starts to lose a bit of quality as far as I know .. rather monterei an ND filter .... My not want to be absolutely a critical, but from personal experience some conflicting opinions can only benefit XD Greetings .. Nicola :)

Gianfra311

sent on August 07, 2012 (9:07) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Thanks Nicola, your comment is precious ... I must tell you that the color taken from the beach is natural and came from a lamp post on the road. I did not necessarily saturated because it would adversely affect the whole image and the sunset would not be so "delicate" says Johnjz.
Cmq you're right about the fact that the beach could divert a little 'look, maybe I ritaglierò a piece. Let me ask you then why do you say f/22 the image may lose some 'quality ... technically you can explain why? Thank you :-)

user14758

sent on August 07, 2012 (10:29) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

So it is ideal for landscapes f/11 .. as it closes the iris from what I know they also reduce the rays that pass, until you get to a point in which it occurs the phenomenon of "diffraction" ... The lenses are operating normally with the refraction, ie the rays as they come in contact with the lenses beyond changing the angle with which they are dispatched after passing the lens .. a bit like when you look at the landscape through a glass of water .. see all deformed .. this is due to refraction, which of course varies greatly in relation to the medium that crosses the light .. then there is the reflection (when one looks in the mirror, the rays are reflected) but it is not the case here .. and finally the "diffraction" .. consists of a fairly significant deviation of light rays ... this "deviation" becomes important diaphragm fully closed .. these raggi "diffracted" should not interfere with the "diffracted" .. so the image loses quality ... are not very knowledgeable about this, but I think I was pretty clear ... so if you want my advice to get silk effects on the water at times when there is still a little light mount ND filters ... cmq leave you some advice ... if you get some time to photograph a landscape with the sun ... Try Before wide open and then close all the diaphragm .. in some cases the diffraction serves .. see how they change the rays of the sun .. recalls that in photographing the sun's rays through the viewfinder lluminosi are dangerous to the retina .. I always use the live view :)

Gianfra311

sent on August 07, 2012 (10:57) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Thanks Nicola, clear explanation ... I wonder at this point what kind of picture is better to use smaller apertures of f/11. Cmq certainly keep account of your advice ;-)

user14758

sent on August 07, 2012 (11:00) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Until now, the only case in which I was to have served with all the sun rays piercing ... but otherwise max 11 or 14 ... not more ... rather, as I said try to use filters .. The ND (neutral density) reduces the light entering the view .. you can use longer and the water of the sea looks silk ... can be exploited also with the clouds .. but it is a little more complicated ...

Gianfra311

sent on August 07, 2012 (11:04) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

What kind of ND filter do you use? That ring that is screwed to the lens or slab type Cokin?

user14758

sent on August 07, 2012 (11:33) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

what is screwed .. a nd to 9 diaphragms .... a monstrous thing ... like this: take the movement of nuvle in the late afternoon .. what is perhaps the only case in which justifies f/22 ... that is, if photographers soft things such as water or clouds landscape without them less noticeable diffraction

Gianfra311

sent on August 07, 2012 (13:03) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

even a ND9?? but how much it cost you? :-) I have a Cokin ND4 a plate that I used with my predecente analog camera.
Nicola, can you explain better the visual effect of these diffractions that may occur in a photo?

user14758

sent on August 07, 2012 (13:38) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

that is, the image is a bit noisy, grainy ... more I found out in amie expenses .. I took a sunset f/22 ... Well I tell you that when I crop the image in PP lost much quality .. If you do a field test is better .. I guess the filter 90 euro .. but it's worth it all ...

Soulwoman

sent on September 20, 2012 (9:43) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

A glimpse beautiful, the most photographed the inhabitants of Palermo. I like that for the sense of peace that, even given the immobility of the water and the warm colors of the sunset just past.

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

Some comments may have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator.