JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here
Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 253000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
sent on May 04, 2015 (23:05) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
With this relative aperture, f5.6 ISO 100 ee would try a time of 1/250 sec. So it seems a photo taken as the sun burned. Con questa apertura relativa, f5,6 ee iso 100 proverei un tempo di 1/250 sec. Così sembra una foto fatta al sole tanto è bruciata.
sent on May 05, 2015 (16:04) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Consciously not in focus. That night was very bad, very cloudy. I'm doing tests and these are the first experiences. Accettasi tips Consciamente non è a fuoco. Quella notte è stata molto brutta, molto nuvolosa. Sto facendo prove e queste sono prime esperienze. Accettasi consigli
sent on May 05, 2015 (22:38) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
It is also probably a little bit blurred but maybe even too much. The edge of the subject is still quite pronounced. What is wrong is the show .... the moon does not have details because it is burned. Normally the moon the photographer with the following data: ISO 400 F 11 T 1/250 sec Your 10 seconds of installation would be nice to take pictures of the ashen light of the moon, that is the part illiminata by reflected light from the sun and not the Earth .... and it would probably be too much for that. Please try again with fast times doing is this: you're photographing a subject exposed to the full light of the sun and so you have a more or less act like you fotografassi an object in broad daylight. It should not be considered the fact that everything around you ... the super oxen pestosurface of the moon you want to photograph is in broad daylight and sunlight. Show us your progress Probabilmente è anche un pochino sfuocata ma forse nemmeno troppo. Il bordo del soggetto è comunque abbastanza netto. Quello che è sbagliato è l'esposizione....la luna non ha dettagli perchè è bruciata. Normalmente la luna la fotografo con i seguenti dati: ISO 400 F 11 T 1/250 sec I tuoi 10 secondi di posa andrebbero bene per fotografare la luce cinerea della luna, cioè la parte illiminata dalla luce riflessa della Terra e non dal sole....e probabilmente sarebbe troppo anche per quello. Riprova con tempi veloci facendo questa considerazione: stai fotografando un oggetto esposto alla luce piena del sole e quindi devi più o meno comportarti come se fotografassi un oggetto in pieno giorno. Non va considerato il fatto che tutto intorno è buoi pesto...la superficie della luna che vuoi fotografare si trova in pieno giorno e piena luce solare. Facci vedere i tuoi progressi
![[retina]](shared_files/layout/retina_badge.jpg){kind=icon}
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
17.9 MEGAPIXEL
Resize to fit window
