What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on October 29, 2014 (11:09) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Lovely view, shame about the white ones burned in the end ... Hello Francis:-) Bello scorcio , peccato per quei bianchi bruciati in fondo... Ciao Francesco |
| sent on October 29, 2014 (15:57) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Hello Francis, indeed in the original photo were not so "burned" but since there was a building propped up (which still can be seen), I decided to burn still in a bit ...
in fact it might be better to blur ...
thanks for the advice:-) ciao Francesco, in verità nella foto originale non erano così "bruciati" ma poichè vi era un palazzo puntellato (che ancora si intravede) ho preferito bruciare ancora un pelino... in effetti forse sarebbe stato meglio sfocare... grazie del consiglio |
| sent on November 17, 2014 (9:20) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
The idea is "almost good": the picture on the right is cut off part of the frame due to the "almost". Clonerei the cone on the left and the two carboys that can be seen to the right: the cone you can see, the carboys are cut. I would make darker all that is surrounded by the arc, trying to make it more dramatic. It does not seem clear / I do not understand where is the fire / I seem mixed.
Do not comment because the white area already explained above. L'idea è "quasi buona": l'inquadratura tagliata sulla destra che toglie parte della cornice causa il "quasi". Clonerei il cono a sinistra e le due damigiane che si intravedono a destra: il cono non si può vedere, le damigiane sono tagliate. Renderei più scuro tutto ciò che è contornato dall'arco, cercando di renderlo più drammatico. Non mi sembra nitida / non capisco dove sia il fuoco / mi sembra impastata. Non commento la zona bianca perchè già spiegata sopra. |
| sent on November 17, 2014 (11:09) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
the frame is so narrow because every time I have to remove the 50ino the car to put the remote serial I feel bad ... so it's a repeating defect ... unfortunately! :-(
the cone is actually really bad! I have to decide to put his hand in ps
Thanks:-) l'inquadratura è così stretta perchè ogni volta che devo togliere il 50ino dalla macchina per mettere il tele di serie mi sento male... quindi è un difetto ricorrente... purtroppo! il cono effettivamente è proprio brutto! devo proprio decidermi a mettere mano a ps grazie |
| sent on November 17, 2014 (11:16) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
It is not "tele" series, is the kit lens. Canvas is an objective of focal length, the lens kit, I guess 18-55 is a zoom. Non è "il tele" di serie, è l'obiettivo kit. Tele è un obiettivo di focale lunga, l'obiettivo kit, immagino 18-55, è uno zoom. |
| sent on November 27, 2014 (22:14) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
ok ok;-) ok ok |
| sent on April 28, 2015 (11:31) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
A bell'angolino rural. Besides, in the Val di Vara, if one likes this kind, which has really fun
Greetings Luca Un bell'angolino rurale. D'altronde in Val di Vara, se uno ama questo genere, ha veramente di che divertirsi Saluti Luca |
| sent on April 28, 2015 (18:59) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thanks Luca :) Grazie Luca :) |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |