What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on November 23, 2013 (19:54) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Many thanks to Victor and Mario!
@ Mario: is in effect at f8 would have been even better. Slowly I realize that when I come across occasions so close is better to close. The D7100 exposing well to 3200iso satisfactory results in birdlife. In other cases, we can be satisfied with the result even higher iso. Surprising!
PS: girigola made sure! I hope to meet you next season also saw that you strike me as a frequenter of Cona! See you soon! Grazie mille a Vittorio e Mario!
@Mario: si in effetti a f8 sarebbe stata ancora meglio. Piano piano mi rendo conto che quando mi capitano occasioni così da vicino è meglio chiudere. La D7100 esponendo bene anche a 3200iso da risultati soddisfacenti in avifauna. In altri casi ci si può accontentare anche del risultato con iso più alti. Soprendente!
PS: fatta in girigola certo! Spero di incontrarti la prossima stagione visto che anche te mi sembri un frequentatore della Cona! A presto! |
| sent on November 23, 2013 (20:59) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Good composition, surgical maf, colors, focus and detail. 1/800sec. were insufficient to dynamically clicks, then I would have concentrated in this static lowering the ISO and the aperture closing in a bit in favor of the pdc and retail (already good anyway). Atmosphere cultured on top! For me, the cheeks are ok for the chinstrap who cares :-) (imho). Try for a moment darken it using the editor Juza and then restores this version and tell me which of the two most convincing. hello and good living, bay Buoni la composizione, la maf chirurgica, i colori, lo sfocato e il dettaglio. 1/800sec. erano insufficienti per uno scatto dinamico, mi sarei quindi concentrato in questo statico abbassando gli iso e chiudendo un pelino il diaframma a favore della pdc e del dettaglio (già comunque buono). Atmosfera colta al top! Per me le guanciotte sono o.k. per il sottogola chissenefrega  (imho) . Prova per un attimo scurirla usando l'editor di juza e poi ripristini questa versione e dimmi quale delle due di convince di più. ciao e buona vita, lauro |
| sent on November 23, 2013 (21:08) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thanks Lauro pass! The time of 1/800s was for the most precarious position other. I was not very comfortable! :-D
For the diaphragm are instead agree more. I tried to darken in 1 click but my monitor seems so dark ... Tell me what you think ...
Even the other with the wad expulsion print that I brought myself have darkened (and another) a little so it's almost sure that my montor me false reading (and I would say that it is normal being a laptop! ). Grazie Lauro del passaggio! Il tempo di 1/800s era per la posizione precaria più altro. Non ero molto comodo! 
Per il diaframma sono d'accordissimo invece. Ho provato a scurirla di 1 click ma a mio monitor sembra tanto scura... Dimmi te cosa ne pensi...
Anche l'altra con la borra in espulsione che ho portato a stampare me l'hanno scurita (e anche un'altra) un pò quindi è quasi sicuro che il mio montor mi falsi la lettura (e direi che è normale essendo un portatile!). |
| sent on November 23, 2013 (21:30) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Personally I prefer this version and the chinstrap gains without sforzature and with the darker eye. For your laptop go in the options and run an underweight (edit: c overexposure 8-)) minimal. (IMHO). hello and good living, bay Personalmente preferisco questa versione e il sottogola ne guadagna senza sforzature e con l'occhio più dark. Per il tuo portatile vai nelle opzioni ed esegui una sottoesposizione (edit: e.c. sovra esposizione ) minimal. (imho). ciao e buona vita, lauro |
| sent on November 23, 2013 (21:42) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Great detail, shame about the damn chin that sometimes we care, now I tend to underexpose chronically martinis ...
Compliments
Hello
Roberto Grande dettaglio, peccato per il maledetto sottogola che a volte ci frega, ormai tendo a sottoesporre cronicamente i martini...
Complimenti
Ciao
Roberto |
| sent on November 23, 2013 (21:52) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
OT the roost when it would be preferable to prune the corner, cut perfectly vertical 8-) O.T. quel posatoio sarebbe preferibile potarlo quando fa l'angolo, con taglio perfettamente verticale |
| sent on November 24, 2013 (7:17) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I will try to adjust the monitor. Overexposure in case. I see it too dark ... ;-)
Also thanks to Robert! :-) Proverò a regolare il monitor. SOVRAesposizione casomai. Io la vedo troppo scura... 
Grazie anche a Roberto! |
user789 | sent on December 19, 2013 (17:56) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Beautiful moment! :-P
hello
Paul Bellissimo momento! 
ciao
Paolo |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
![[retina]](shared_files/layout/retina_badge.jpg){kind=icon}
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
![I saw you! [HD 24MP]...](https://img2.juzaphoto.com/001/shared_files/uploads/612490_l.jpg "I saw you! [HD 24MP]...")
24.0 MEGAPIXEL
Resize to fit window
