What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on May 31, 2013 (17:14) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
WOW! f/0.95 ... wow! impressive! Although it is only a test, and as such should be taken to avoid unrealistic comparisons, I like the colors and the atmosphere ... WOW! f/0.95... impressionante! Anche se è solo un test, e come tale va preso evitando confronti improponibili, a me piacciono i colori e l'atmosfera... |
| sent on May 31, 2013 (17:35) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
quoto St1, this objective reportage and portrait churns out stuff in my tears. quoto St1, questo obiettivo in reportage e ritratto secondo me sforna roba da lacrime. |
| sent on May 31, 2013 (22:16) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
and used so what do you say .... Shot on Red Epic M with Leica M 50mm f/0.95 Noctilux 4K at 120fps. e usato cosi che ne dite....Shot on Red Epic M with Leica M 50mm Noctilux f/0.95 at 4K 120fps. |
| sent on June 01, 2013 (13:41) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
is an optical considering how to shoot in the dark on a light background cartoon ... I think that would mark the decline of very light, I thought it was more appropriate to its image circle coverage (considering the cost), but I really like the yield :-) has an incredible mood è un ottica per scattare al buio considerato quanto vignetta...su fondo chiaro penso che marcherebbe molto il calo di luce, pensavo fosse più corretto il suo cerchio immagine di copertura(considerato il costo) però mi piace molto la resa ha un mood incredibile |
| sent on June 01, 2013 (19:18) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
The Noctilux, in various forms, not born to do landscapes, then wide open ... Clear we are talking about then a sample of a sensor pasty babe gets her figure anyway, but I think a test of portraits and reportage would be his bread. In any case, thanks for the test. Il Noctilux, nelle varie declinazioni, non nasce proprio per fare paesaggi, poi a tutta apertura... Chiaro stiamo parlando di un campione poi su un sensore pastoso fà la sua figura comunque, ma credo che un test su ritratti e reportage sarebbe stato il suo pane. In ogni caso grazie per la prova. |
| sent on June 01, 2013 (22:58) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
“ I think a test of portraits and reportage would be his bread. „
I agree, I will soon too! " credo che un test su ritratti e reportage sarebbe stato il suo pane. " concordo, presto farò anche questo! |
| sent on June 02, 2013 (9:54) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I concur with st1, the comparison does not make sense. In addition, the 7d is paid in full light the other in the shade. Comparisons are made for similar items. You can not compare a plane with a panda .... The NOCTILUX to ta like all f1 and its not clear already on near objects let alone in the landscape! Mi associo con st1, il confronto non ha senso. Inoltre la 7d è rivolta in piena luce l'altra in ombra. I confronti si fanno per articoli simili. Non si può paragonare un aereo con una panda.... Il noctilux a ta come tutti gli f1 e dintorni non sono nitidi già su oggetti vicini figuriamoci in paesaggio!!! |
| sent on June 03, 2013 (13:52) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
the sharpness of the guys here has little or nothing to do with this lens, the artistic possibilities and the types of photos you can do are completely different from any wide-angle! woe to compare it with a wide angle! never mind then the sharpness .......... as far as I'm concerned the effect of the lens is very fabulous, I do not know if it's worth spending € 3000 cm ² but it is fabulous! considering the cost-yield perhaps 50 f 1.2 canon is the best choice, then if one is "crazy" you can also take maybe 50 f1 ragazzi qua la nitidezza c'entra poco o nulla con questa lente, le possibilità artistiche e le tipologie di foto che puoi fare sono completamente diverse da un qualsiasi grandangolo!! guai a confrontarlo con un grandangolo!lasciamo stare poi la nitidezza.......... per quanto mi riguarda l'effetto della lente è decisamente favoloso, non so se valga la pena spendere 3000 euro ma è cmq favolosa!! considerando il rapporto costo resa forse il 50 f,1,2 canon è la scelta migliore, se poi uno è "pazzo" si puo anche prendere magari il 50 f1 |
| sent on June 03, 2013 (14:12) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
“ fabulous, I do not know if it's worth spending € 3000 cm ² but it is fabulous! „
You ... maybe I'll take 2. € 9100 List! " favoloso, non so se valga la pena spendere 3000 euro ma è cmq favolosa!! " ...si magari, ne prendo 2. 9.100€ di listino! |
| sent on June 03, 2013 (20:32) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Good evening. Speaking of this jewel, you can say anything, unless it is a masterpiece. I'm glad that we talk about ourselves and if it were not extinguished, even of Shinar. Being able to spend, own it's a real pleasure. Ciao.Franco. Buona sera. Parlando di questo gioiello, si puo dire tutto, meno che non è un capolavoro. Sono contento che si parla di Leica e se non fosse estinto, anche di Sinar. Potendo spendere, possederlo è un vero piacere. Ciao.Franco. |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |