CHIURLO MAJOR 5K WITH R5, page 2

JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.

OK, I confirm

You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept Cookies

Customize

Refuse Cookies

Galleries
Birds

16.7 MEGAPIXEL

Resize to fit window

Chiurlo maggiore View gallery (10 photos)

CHIURLO MAJOR 5K WITH R5 sent on August 19, 2020 (6:30) by Candido Luca. 25 comments, 2158 views.

con Canon EF 1.4x III, 1/2000 f/8.0, ISO 500, hand held. Specie: Numenius arquata

Ok ragazzi lascio solo questa come primo esempio del file della 5R. ho cancellato quelle che secondo voi erano micromosse e vi ho raddrizzato il lago.ahahahaha probabilmente il chiurlo maggiore era il soggetto peggiore che potessi scegliere da postare, visto il suo piumaggio infimo, la barchetta, e la temperatura dell'acqua. Il raffronto doveva essere fatto con i file del chiurlo della SR. per il resto la macchina da settore al meglio ed una post dedicata sono ancora da trovare. Ciao a tutti.

View High Resolution 16.7 MP

70 persons like it: Actionclick, Adamantio, Alberto Tirri, Albieri Sergio, Alessandro Cale', Alessandro Callea, Andrea Boscaro Photo, Andrea Casolin, Antonio Dell'Aquila, Arvina, Atrox, Balzani Antonio, Bo Larkeed, Bono Vittorino, Claudio Cortesi, Claudio Sciarra, DavideOtta, Domenico, Ecka, Ellezeta, Fabio Rosas, Fausto Pesce, Fedebobo, Francesco Sartori, FrancescoDePalma91, Franco_63, Gabriele Bartozzi, Gentili Marco, Giampaolo Riva, Gian Antonio Zapparoli, Gianfranco Cinelli, Jancas, John_lessreal, Kappona, Latino Rosario, Liviu22, Luca Costa, Luca Peroni, Marco Cirillo, Marco Persoglia, Marco1963, Marco50, Mario Vigo, Mattia_dei_, Maurizio Attiani, Mauro Vianello Lucifer, Pallotta Luigi, Paolo Macis, Pawel68, Picco Umberto, Pitrone, Quellolà, Renzo Bagatella, Rimas, Roberto Vacca, Rodoss, Rosario Cafiso, Sanmattei, Satish Ranadive, Scapinblak, Spanu Luigi, Swallow, Tito 1960, Tortax, Ultimo, Valeria Marchioni, Valerio Colantoni, Valter Degni, Vincenzo Sciumè, Wolfman1908

PAGE: « PREVIOUS PAGE | ALL PAGES |

What do you think about this photo?

Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?

You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.

Sanmattei

sent on August 23, 2020 (11:04) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Beautiful shot
R5 withdrawn yesterday with 600 f11 IS STM (waiting for 100/500)
Too for work reasons I won't be able to test it until next Saturday (better so :-D at least I study and set the best way all )
Veting your shot but I came a great desire
Compliments again Sandro

Giacopiane

sent on August 23, 2020 (14:01) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Hello,
beautiw photo, I go a great sharpness, did you apply sharpen?
hello
S.

Candido Luca

sent on August 24, 2020 (8:59) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

[quota] did you apply sharpen? „ hello Jacobean. Thank you for the ride. I gave a little bit of sharpness only in some strategic points. The file was well defined at the start. A greeting

Eliostella

sent on September 04, 2020 (2:32) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Beautiful

Tortax

sent on October 13, 2021 (13:42) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

From what little I saw the 5DsR gave more crispy rows and with better colors the files of the 5R seem a little washed out and less crispy, at least what I saw on the photos of the eye ... probably as it seems to me that you also say depends on a post still to be "calibrated".
Compliments for photos.
Hello

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

PAGE: « PREVIOUS PAGE | ALL PAGES |

Some comments may have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator.