What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on October 22, 2022 (6:31) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Beautiful photos, congratulations. I saw that you used the 2x III multiplier.... May I ask what you think? Many say that the AF is only good with '1.4x.... Bellissima foto, complimenti. Ho visto che hai usato il moltiplicatore 2x III.... Posso chiederti cosa ne pensi? Molti dicono che l'AF va bene solo col '1,4x.... |
| sent on October 22, 2022 (15:34) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I answer you immediately Gio, this lens has an excellent smooth yield and with 1.4 x with the 2 x in addition to losing a bit of sharpness (as normal) in fact reacts + slowly. I had to use the duplicator because at 400 mm it is often short and that's why I returned to the 500 f4 isII regretting the weight.
A salutone and thanks
Marco Ti rispondo immediatamente Gio, quest'ottica ha un ottima resa liscia e con 1,4 x con il 2 x oltre a perdere un pò di nitidezza ( come normale) in effetti reagisce + lentamente. Io ho dovuto usare il duplicatore perchè a 400 mm spesso si è corti e per questo che sono ritornato al 500 f4 isII rimpiangendo il peso.
Un salutone e grazie
Marco |
| sent on October 22, 2022 (19:11) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thanks Mark.... I have the 100 500 RF 7.1 ... I think that soon I will take the 400 f4 do with the 1.4x for photos in flight, and the 500 f4 II with the 2x to photograph distant birds, example eagle's nest and pilgrim. What do you say? Grazie Marco.... Io ho il 100 500 RF 7,1...penso che a breve prenderò il 400 f4 do con il 1,4x per le foto in volo, e il 500 f4 II con il 2x per fotografare uccelli lontani, esempio nido di aquila e di pellegrino. Che ne dici? |
| sent on October 22, 2022 (19:36) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Since you have the R7 therefore the 500 can be used smooth being already an 800 then for the 400 see You but with 100-500 and 500 f4 the 400 could be a strange measure with an f equal to 500, I did not love it so much I
also have the 100/500 and I am fine but I use an FF R5
Good light Visto che hai la R7 pertanto il 500 si può usare liscio essendo già un 800 poi per il 400 vedi Tu ma con 100-500 e 500 f4 il 400 potrebbe essere una misura strana con un f uguale al 500, io non l'ho amato tantissimo
Anch'io ho il 100/500 e mi trovo benissimo però uso una FF R5
Buona luce |
| sent on October 22, 2022 (19:56) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thank you very much Mark, you have removed so many doubts .. . Good light to you. To resent us Grazie infinite Marco, mi hai tolto tanti dubbi.. . Buona luce a te. A risentirci |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
![[retina]](shared_files/layout/retina_badge.jpg){kind=icon}
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
3.8 MEGAPIXEL
Resize to fit window
