What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on November 12, 2017 (23:23) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Very nice !! a greeting, Piero. Molto bella!! un saluto, Piero. |
| sent on November 12, 2017 (23:24) | This comment has been translated
Thanks Piero. |
| sent on November 12, 2017 (23:35) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Very scenic .... superb ;-) Molto scenografica .... superba |
| sent on November 12, 2017 (23:54) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Great photographic achievement of a wonderful panorama :-) Great sharpness and wonderful colors. I like very much. Hello, James. Ottima realizzazione fotografica di un panorama stupendo Grande nitidezza e colori meravigliosi. Mi piace molto. Ciao,Giacomo. |
| sent on November 12, 2017 (23:56) | This comment has been translated
Thank you all! |
| sent on November 13, 2017 (4:42) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Beautiful ... dramatic atmosphere .... well done ... Bella...atmosfera drammatica....bene eseguita... |
| sent on November 13, 2017 (7:00) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Nice shot! Wonderful effect. Bello scatto! Effetto meraviglioso. |
| sent on November 13, 2017 (8:41) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Many thanks! :-) Molte grazie! |
| sent on November 13, 2017 (9:32) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
The picture is moving ... It seems to me then you know something strange, "incoherent": I mean the top portion of the sky so clear, almost white, as opposed to the purple of a sun set in the dark of the city. Can it be just my feeling, was the scene so? La foto è mossa... Mi pare poi ci sai qualcosa di strano, di "incoerente": intendo la porzione in alto del cielo così chiara, quasi bianca, in contrapposizione al viola di un sole tramontato e allo scuro della città. Può essere solo una mia sensazione, la scena era così? |
| sent on November 13, 2017 (9:38) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
“ The photo is moved ... It seems to me then you know something strange, "incoherent": I mean the upper portion of the sky so clear, almost white, as opposed to the purple of a sun set in the dark of the city . Can it be just my sensation, was the scene so? „
It was exactly that and I do not really find it a move. " La foto è mossa... Mi pare poi ci sai qualcosa di strano, di "incoerente": intendo la porzione in alto del cielo così chiara, quasi bianca, in contrapposizione al viola di un sole tramontato e allo scuro della città. Può essere solo una mia sensazione, la scena era così?" Si era esattamente così e sinceramente non la trovo mossa. |
| sent on November 13, 2017 (9:55) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
You're right, I've been deceiving the pink palaces on the left and in some trouble, it's not moving Hai ragione, mi hanno ingannato i palazzi rosa sulla sinistra e in po' di disturbo, non è mossa |
| sent on November 13, 2017 (9:57) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Unfortunately there is noise but being iso 100 the only one is that maybe I have exaggerated with PP sharpness. Il disturbo purtroppo c'è ma essendo a iso 100 l'unica è che forse ho esagerato con nitidezza in PP. |
| sent on November 13, 2017 (10:40) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
The picture is very enjoyable. I would have lowered a pdr file to include more "cities" that seems truncated like this. The real problem is the quality of the file .. very disturbed and with more than a few solos. There was perhaps a better indication of a mouldover. Very three-dimensional sky La foto è gradevolissima. Avrei abbassato un filino il pdr per includere più "città" che sembra troncata così. Il vero problema è la qualità del file..molto disturbato e con più di qualche alone. Era forse più indicata una multiesposizione. Cielo molto tridimensionale |
user72446 | sent on November 13, 2017 (11:01) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Very very beautiful picture. Three dimensional and saturated at the right point. Beautiful shooting point Foto molto molto Bella. Tridimensionale e satura al punto giusto. Bellissimo il punto di ripresa |
| sent on November 13, 2017 (11:02) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Special pictures ... I would have given less space to the sky above the clouds that in my opinion loses a bit. But sunset (or sunrise) is very beautiful and also the conicity of the landscape that looks to the city. Overall I have to say I like it! :-D Foto particolare...avrei dato meno spazio al cielo sopra le nuvole che secondo me fa perdere un pò. Però il tramonto (o alba) è molto bello e anche la conicità del paesaggio che porta lo sguardo verso la città. Nel complesso devo dire che mi piace! |
| sent on November 13, 2017 (14:44) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
In my opinion, the photo is unbalanced, too little sky space to the city. However you can not say it is a bad photo. This photo could be 10 with the praise, unfortunately for me it is 8. Secondo me la foto è poco equilibrata, troppo spazio al cielo poco alla città. Comunque non si può dire che è una brutta foto. Questa foto poteva essere 10 con la lode, purtroppo per me è 8. |
| sent on November 13, 2017 (18:21) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
This shot I really like. But wanting to find the hair in the egg just to f / 4? I would have closed at least f / 8 to get a better picture, thanks to the greater depth of field and the star dust (stars on the lights, I ask if the term escapes me)! ;-) Questo scatto mi piace molto. Ma volendo trovare il pelo nell'uovo perché limitarsi ad f/4? avrei chiuso almeno ad f/8 per avere un immagine migliore, sia grazie alla maggiore profondità di campo, sia grazie allo star dust (le stelle sui punti luci, chiedo venia se il termine mi sfugge)! |
| sent on November 13, 2017 (20:46) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I agree 100% with Pippo, I would cut the sky and include the more palaces in the box. The PP is too marked in terms of contrast and saturation, I would try to make the MPs to compensate for the high contrast between the lights of the sky and the city. David Concordo al 100% con Pippo,avrei tagliato il cielo e incluso di più i palazzi nell'inquadratura. La PP è troppo marcata in termini di contrasto e saturazione, proverei a fare delle multiesposizioni per compensare l'elevato contrasto tra le luci del cielo e della città. Davide |
| sent on November 14, 2017 (11:01) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thanks to everyone for comments and advice ;-)
I can not understand what caused the disorder being iso to 100. Grazie a tutti per i commenti e i consigli Non riesco a capire cosa abbia causato il disturbo essendo iso a 100. |
| sent on November 14, 2017 (13:07) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Beautiful colors and beautiful PDR. The lack of clarity is definitely due to diaphragm f4, why did you use the tripod? Bei colori e bel PDR. La scarsa nitidezza è sicuramente dovuta al diaframma f4, perché se hai usato il treppiedi? |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |