RCE Foto

(i) On JuzaPhoto, please disable adblockers (let's see why!)






Login LogoutJoin JuzaPhoto!
JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.


OK, I confirm


You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept CookiesCustomizeRefuse Cookies


  1. Galleries
  2. »
  3. Birds
  4. » Red and yellow 2

 
Red and yellow 2...

Airone rosso

View gallery (60 photos)

Red and yellow 2 sent on May 26, 2016 (13:37) by 66tonycar. 51 comments, 4626 views. [retina]

con Canon EF 2.0x III, 1/2500 f/9.0, ISO 1250, hand held. Specie: Ardea purpurea

Anche se simile all'altra, la posto per i dettagli del piumaggio che sembrano risaltare di più, ritaglio a 3600 px lato lungo



View High Resolution 5.4 MP  

117 persons like it: Alberto87, Albertocappellacci, Albieri Sergio, Alby85, Alessandro Mattiello, Alessandro Riva, Alessio Roattino, Andnol, Andrea Marzorati, Andy 66, Annamaria Pertosa, Anto55, Antoniof, Aringhe Blu, Arvina, Beppe Lobba, Boland, Bono Vittorino, Carlo OZ, Carlo Tavallini, Ceresi Claudio, Ciccio Bartolotta, Codino, Cusman, Dalzottomarco, Diamante_P, Diego.mancuso, Domenico, Domenik, Dramtastic, Duell, Ecka, Enzo1932, Etneo71, Fabio Mangani, Fabrizio Municchi, Fabrizios53, Felice Di Palma, Fernando Fuso, Fggalassi, Fidel62, Fingolfin75, Flammeus, Francesco Abbate, Francesco Bonini, Francesco Cavalieri, Francesco Iafelice, Francesco Puntiroli, Fulvio Lagana', Gabber, Gabriele Bartozzi, Gabriele Breschi, Gaetano De Rosa, Gazebo, Gentili Marco, Gi87, Gianfranco1956, Gianniluigi, Giorgio Guarraia, Giuseppe Vallazza, Harm, Jancas, Korra88, Laerte, Latino Rosario, Luca1970, Lupo Manulo, Marco Caramello, Marco Maggini, Marco Marchelli, Marco Riccardi, Marcophotographer, Mariobo58, Mariomazzurana, Massimo Greco, Massimo-tiga, Massimo55, Maxapols, Michele Forlani, Nadir Francesco Capoccia, Nedellis, Oliver3b, Orso364, Pallotta Luigi, Paolino_61, Parvati, Piergiovanni Pierantozzi, Plaf2000, Pumabg, Quellolà, Renata Ponso, Riccardo Arena Trazzi, Riccardo Bacchi, Ricky_71, Roberto Ravecca, Roberto Vacca, Roberto1977, Roberto7i, Robin22, Roy72chi, Silvio Madeddu, Simet7610, Siro, Spanu Luigi, Steff, Stiglic89, Sunny Cloud, Supercecc56, Thom, Undertaker, Valerio Colantoni, Vincenzo Iacovoni, Vincenzo Sciumè, Vittorio Fracassi, Vittorio Scatolini, Wildphotography, Wolfman1908




What do you think about this photo?


Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?


You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.




avatarsupporter
sent on May 27, 2016 (10:46) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Beautiful subject immortalized well and dynamism in a beautiful setting set.
Unfortunately the file is compromised by a wrong post or shake-as mentioned above ..
Anyway ... this is a nice moment caught !! ;-)
A greeting.

avatarsenior
sent on May 27, 2016 (10:47) | This comment has been translated

Eeeek!!!Eeeek!!!

avatarsupporter
sent on May 27, 2016 (11:53) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Perhaps the most correct view is that of Alexander, then cmque post the raw x see how you can improve.
Thanks again for your visit and comments

avatarjunior
sent on May 27, 2016 (12:41) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

micro move ... I do not think this weather and the weight of the goal is impossible.
Regarding the stabilizer do not know but it seems strano..Complimenti still to shoot.

avatarsenior
sent on May 27, 2016 (13:10) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Another great picture like the other, but here the hd files highlighted the flaws exposed by the previously been involved friends, honestly makes me think of an AF error, did you calibrate the 600 with markII?

avatarsenior
sent on May 27, 2016 (13:18) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Beautiful laying.

avatarsupporter
sent on May 27, 2016 (13:36) | This comment has been translated

Really nice, congratulations!

avatarsupporter
sent on May 27, 2016 (13:49) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Thanks again for your comments, now place the raw, however, I realized that the cut file is not 3600 p but 2902x basic accuracy is therefore even smaller MOOLTO, then shooting in raw as you can see overexposure has around 0 , 8 EV, but correctable without problems in pp ..

avatarsupporter
sent on May 27, 2016 (13:50) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

www.dropbox.com/s/y1gotzwjgfx5rct/BD6I5427.CR2?dl=0

avatarjunior
sent on May 27, 2016 (13:55) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

A beautiful classic, maybe you did something in PW on the head that I do not back but it is still beautiful
Hello
Valerio

avatarsupporter
sent on May 27, 2016 (14:03) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Pulse, from the raw file you can see what I did
with the passage
Hello

user44432
avatar
sent on May 27, 2016 (14:20) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

This is my interpretation ..... it is clear that over the long side 1600px I would not feel to go .... thanks






avatarsenior
sent on May 27, 2016 (14:51) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

In my opinion the development of 66tonycar is more natural, still remains the objective fact that the quality, caused by crop and focal doubler, is this. So the author has done the maximum and the result is a beautiful image but can only be appreciated with a "from web" resolution.
Hello

avatarsenior
sent on May 27, 2016 (14:56) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

I'll try tomorrow afternoon ;-)

avatarsupporter
sent on May 27, 2016 (15:03) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Really super.
Hello, Rosario

avatarsupporter
sent on May 27, 2016 (15:34) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Magnificent pictures. Compliments
Maximum

avatarsupporter
sent on May 27, 2016 (18:37) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Thanks Lorenzo x pp +/- with the results we're there, expect those of Roberto, quoto 100% "Alexander,
Thanks again for your attention to all participants
;-)

avatarsenior
sent on May 27, 2016 (19:50)

Lovely details!

avatarsenior
sent on May 27, 2016 (22:35) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

I do not think either shake-but merely away and pdc question that tapers d Consequently, the B that I have permission to download to view it is also known a strong temperature, all counting that was made with a 600 duplicate 2x, means at least 50 meters away and perhaps even more, quoto fully Alessandro Mattiello, most of this is little to do for the quality, the colors however i corrected them, in Lorenzo's version there is a strong dominant blue / purple, the pinions from memory I think they are gray ash. ;-)

avatarsenior
sent on May 28, 2016 (16:22) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

So, here I am, clarified my doubt, I worked trying to be faithful to the original shooting:



I had to interpolate to enlarge the original file, as it was a big crop, processed and reduced to 1600 px to give it the dignity it deserves.
The main problem of this shot but I will explain this:



With many af the reflex points automatically put in another fire, probably misled by the flicker of? optical (since it's free hand), it took a single point and a support ;-)


RCE Foto

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)



Some comments may have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator.  Microsoft Translator



 ^

JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.

Mobile Version - juza.ea@gmail.com - Terms of use and Privacy - Cookie Preferences - P. IVA 01501900334 - REA 167997- PEC juzaphoto@pec.it

May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me