RCE Foto

(i) On JuzaPhoto, please disable adblockers (let's see why!)






Login LogoutJoin JuzaPhoto!
JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.


OK, I confirm


You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept CookiesCustomizeRefuse Cookies

Zeiss ZE/ZF.2 Distagon T* 35mm f/1.4 : Specifications and Opinions




Reviews

The opinions of JuzaPhoto members who use this lens.. (Click here to come back to the main page of the Zeiss ZE/ZF.2 Distagon T* 35mm f/1.4)




What do you think about this lens?


Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.





Google Translate  The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.


avatarjunior
sent on May 24, 2015

Pros: one piece

Cons: If you try it, do not let the most

Opinion: I agree with all other comments, particularly the total potting. It 'a jewel that I had dreamed about for 40 years, since the Contax 139, for which I had obtv yashica. But then I could not afford one Zeiss. At the dawn of the 60 years, I got there. It 's just fantastic. I used it in different situations, mainly landscapes, but also in travel situations. It must become proficient in the focus (I wear glasses, and this obviously more complicated). But then as' incredible satisfaction. In particular, the color rendering is not comparable to any other obtv. The comments described by the other photographer friends are all true. Especially I share fanaticism and exaltation of a single lens, the true passion for photography. The shooting studio, composition, search lights, everything is photography, where the much praised (and too used) post-production finally becomes just an accessory.

avatarsenior
sent on November 07, 2014

Pros: It makes you shoot like crazy to anything

Cons: The counter is that you need another body to use other lenses, I wont pull more

Opinion: This opinion is not reliable, I write in a state of total potting. It 's my fourth Zeiss lens but I can not stop falling in love with these wonderful glass. It has amazing colors, a 3D beyond belief. As exciting as a few other purchases in life ... Then the MAF TA easily makes mistakes, but mistakes you learn! RnSe want a 35 character over really think about it, even if the competition (especially in Canon mount) is very agguerrrita ...

avatarsenior
sent on August 10, 2013

Pros: It just does not want to go out to take pictures, the construction is incredibly solid and guarantees unmatched focus fluency, the colors are typical zeiss and excel those nikon.

Cons: Challenging focus due to non-complete longitudinal chromatic aberration correction (LOCA) responsible for some kind of focusing of the focusing field, mirrored with focus peaking but at full aperture it forces you to use the live view (it would be better to Zacuto) to have a high number of photos in focus; Alternatively an aftermarket focus screen like the katzeye.

Opinion: Once handled, it is difficult to position it and make it want to shoot like no other autofocus optics despite the difficulty of focusing may sometimes be frustrating. Focusing screens of autofocus reflexes worsen a situation already made difficult by the non-correction of Locas. There are several solutions to the problem, but all go against the operating speed by actually orienting the user to "think" photographs. If you need to bring home the job without error, you should use a solid high-fidelity autofocus. It's very clear , Not as the new sigma art, but the yield is overall outstanding. The field curve is very well controlled, showing a slight propensity for the "U" forward, very often confused with loss of edge sharpness (speech that applies to all optics). I find her best in landscapes and movies she thinks, while portraits can make the defects too high;)

avatarjunior
sent on May 17, 2013

Pros: Construction MAF ring, all glass and metal, hood compreso.Nitidezza, color rendering.

Cons: Weight, size, costo.A TA just a trifle to misplace the MAF.

Opinion: As with all Zeiss, even the 35/1, 4 is impeccably constructed of glass and its quality are metallo.Le color rendition and sharpness throughout the frame already excellent TA.Chiudendo a couple of stop becomes a razor . The only drawback is the possibility of making a mistake if the fire used to TA freehand ... Make no mistake it is preferable to use it with LW (perhaps magnified by 10 times) on a beautiful ring cavalletto.Della MAF, do I have to mean???





 ^

JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.

Mobile Version - juza.ea@gmail.com - Terms of use and Privacy - Cookie Preferences - P. IVA 01501900334 - REA 167997- PEC juzaphoto@pec.it

May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me